What follows are a couple of items on COVID that demonstrate the attempts by our “betters” to control the narrative surrounding the virus. Both show a manipulation of various “standards” to produce a storyline that reflects the desires of “Big” people, Tech, Media, etc.
The first piece is from Target Liberty’s website. It relates a little noticed change recommended by the CDC last month into how COVID infections should be recognized. Specifically the CDC stated that testing for COVID in cases occurring in a vaccinated patient more than 14 days after completion of the vaccination regimen should not exceed a 28-cycle multiplication factor.
Now last year the multiplication factor for the PCR test was 40 in most cases. Aside from the fact that the PCR method was never designed for such use, the NYTimes had shown last year that such a multiplication factor was essentially useless. False positives were the order of the day when the PCR test was being used at this level.
The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, said not to use PCR for diagnosing disease. Dr.Fauci at one point said that a cycle count over 35 produces useless results at the same time the government advised using a count of 40, clearly abuse of this technology.
Wow. WOW. @cdcgov only wants to examine post-vaccine infections with a PCR threshold of 28 or under.
That standard ignores 90+% of #Covid infections. The entire epidemic would have looked very different if it had been used.
"An RT-PCR Ct value ≤28"https://t.co/4G18gK8HGg
— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) April 29, 2021
Flim flam is the only way to describe this. As Bob Roddis noted:
Before the vaccines, the incentive was to maximize the number of “cases” to maximize the level of hysteria. With the vaccines, the incentive is to minimize the number of “cases” to convince the rabble that the vaccines actually work.
The lowered threshold is only for testing people who have had the vaccine. It is the same threshold used in the vaccine trials to show the “effectiveness” of the vaccines.
The other half of this manipulation of data is below. Vaccine breakthrough cases are just that. These are situations where a person contracts COVID after having been jabbed. Again, the CDC seems to be trying to reduce the data points surfacing that would be negative for the process of being on the receiving end of a jab from an unapproved medicine.
This is just nonsense. At a time when all of this data is computerized and easily filtered based on specific factors, there is no reason to stop collecting all the data that was collected last year. All of this points to the CDC trying to paint the rosiest picture possible regarding the unapproved vaccines. Why? It couldn’t have anything to do with the fact that people who had COVID are more likely to have adverse reactions to the jab, would it?
The second item in this post relates to a presentation made by a mother to a school board regarding the wearing of masks for young children. Once again, I am thankful to Dr. Tom Woods for his efforts in this area. Dr. Woods reported:
|
Of course, YouTube’s actions have nothing to do with keeping the public safe. It is all about controlling what information the public is allowed to hear regardless of its veracity. Big Tech must control the public. The way to do this is to censure any and all information that is contrary to the controlling narrative. Failing to do so may allow the public to discern that Big Tech, Big Media and elite politicians have only their own self interest at heart. That might be disastrous for the oligarchies that want to control the world.