El Gato Malo was a guy who destroyed the fake narratives during the COVID scam. He continues the work of destroying the fantasy bubble that some people prefer to live in. I think he would be an excellent representative of TPUSA.
DataRepublican has continued to release data that was gleaned from a Google public link detailing the planning going on to try to end the Constitutional structure of our country.
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨 Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution. Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren’t working alone. The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T. R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major “blocking” NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that. R2T’s role within UDA is concerned with “the day after tomorrow” – in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons “Big Tent” initiative. Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the “illegal orders” messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A. It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself – especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth. You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to. Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants. As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of “redlines” in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against “peaceful” protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them. Important to understand: The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government. ...
In the previous posts, we laid a ground work for understanding how people in our government used various techniques to undermine legitimate governments in other countries which were disfavored by our own government. Such disfavoring might be a perception of a country that was too authoritarian. Perhaps the country’s leaders were friendly with the “wrong” people.
Supposedly the narrative was these actions “protecting democracy.” This seems to be a catchall phrase that makes everything they do okay. However, their track record has been muddy at best.
The NYTimes is running a story about the Alaska Senate campaign. According to the NYTimes. The Peltola campaign actively recruited a second Dan Sullivan to help split the vote. This is as crooked as it gets. This is the CommunnistsDemocrats at their finest. They will stop at nothing to gain power over the people.
Barbara Boyd weighs in on the budding scandal of a color revolution in this country. Boyd starts with Barack Obama’s October 24 rally in Detroit for Abdul El-Sayed and Elissa Slotkin and the red-green alliance. Then she looks at El-Sayed’s 2012 statement backing Mohamed Morsi’s government. Elise Slotkin’s posts at the National Security Council and the Pentagon come under Boyd’s review as well as the Sunrise Movement’s board and funders.
Boyd follows Data Republican’s files on former officials preparing around the Insurrection Act and 2028 in addition to the Democratic Socialists of America’s platform. Boyd connects this month’s riots in France and comments on Noëlle Lenoir’s interview with Michael Shellenberger. She closes with Marco Rubio and Jared Isaacman on the President, the American System, and making the November 3 midterms too big to rig.
In Part 1, we looked at the methodology that has been used by our government to overthrow governments that were disfavored by ours. The common term used for this process is color revolution. Various examples of such color revolutions were given. These included Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003) and Ukraine (2004-2005). Also Kyrgyzstan (2005), Lebanon (2005), Belarus (2006), Ukraine again (2013-2014) and Armenia (2018).
Cynical Publius helped to provide an outline of how it all works. He defined six lines of attack. These included funding, training, narrative and symbolism, electoral triggers, elite pressure and defection of security forces and military.
It is sometimes amazing the lack of knowledge of people who stake out positions on the current state of reality in this country. Or, in fact, in many places around the world particularly in Europe right now.
A Twitter character known as “el gato malo” was great during the COVID scam at exposing just how little knowledge people had about various aspects of the government’s response to the “greatest threat to human health” in history. More recently he has been digging up examples of people, mostly college students, who decide to debate a Turning Point USA spokesman and who know nothing about the subject that they are bringing up.
I am fairly certain that the term “color revolution is going to see more use over the next few weeks than anyone ever imagined. This is because of the efforts of dataRepublican in exposing what can only be described as the planning of a coup to overthrow our system of government.
There has been much propaganda recently about the use of the Starlink system in Ukraine. Zelenskyy has been crying that the administration had cut Ukraine off from protecting themselves by denying them use of StarShield/Starlink.
Earlier this week, outgoing Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) seemed to indicate that the StarShield system, which is a US government system separate from Starlink, has been disrupted and was exposing American personnel in Ukraine. Cornyn called for an Inspector General investigation. I wonder how many times Cornyn went to Ukraine. Asking for a friend.
Now, it is the official position of the United States government that Ukraine has never had access to the “StarShield” global satellite system used by the United States military for communication and global guidance targeting. Giving Ukraine access to StarShield would be like the United States operating missile and drone targeting of nuclear armed Russia. Obviously, that would not be a good idea.
On Thursday, PDJT went off on Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, the Somali fraudster occupying a seat in Congress under the fake name Ilhan Omar. Yes. Apparently Ilhan Omar is an alias that she has been living under for decades.
A former federal immigration judge said this could “call into question” every document she’s ever filled out with her fake name, Ilhan Omar. Perhaps her election filings and Congressional legitimacy could also be challenged. She should be expelled from Congress.
This certainly might explain her disappearance for several days recently. Omar, who is famous for spouting narratives, was uncharacteristically quiet while the federal search warrants were being executed.