Another video has surfaced of Ellen Ratner saying that Julian Assange had told her in the Ecuadorian embassy that the DNC “hack” was actually an inside job. If it has not already happened, it is time for AG Barr and US Attorney Durham to sit down with Ellen Ratner and Julian Assange to find out how they know what they claim they know.
Assange had offered a reward for information about who murdered Seth Rich that seemed to scream “Seth gave me the info.” And there were reports by computer technical people saying the information from the DNC had to have been copied to a thumb drive.
Dotcom had asserted that the DNC files were copied at a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick. A researcher, who goes by the name Forensicator, determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick.
Science Defies Politics website had noted in April, 2019,
The latest analysis of the WikiLeaks DNC emails by TheForensicator tends to confirm the opinion that the emails, published by WikiLeaks in July 2016, were leaked by a DNC insider who was an unhappy Bernie supporter.
- The emails were apparently extracted from a Microsoft Exchange email server on May 23-25. This was the time when Hillary’s victory became obvious, and the Bernie supporters were angry at the DNC for supposed cheating. (Sample media reporting: https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-sanders-democrats-20160516-snap-story.html)
- Only emails from seven accounts were extracted and transferred to WikiLeaks. Five out of seven were finance directors’. That suggests that the leaker was not only a DNC insider, but a high placed insider with confident knowledge of the DNC’s internal workings.
The Forensicator website did an extensive analysis of the DNC emails published by Wikileaks. The Mueller Report’s claim that the GRU or some other unknown person hacked the emails between May 25 and June 1 in 2016 “lacks merit.”
Apparently, the Special Counsel’s investigators have no proof that the indicted GRU officers actually stole the DNC emails, or that those same emails were the source of the DNC emails published by WikiLeaks. Further, no mention is made of the second (Nov 6) WikiLeaks release of DNC emails (which was roughly equal in number to the first). When we add our observation that over two-thirds of the DNC emails were acquired on May 23 (not May 25 through June 1 as stated in the GRU indictment) we conclude that the Special Counsel’s allegations lack merit.
See their complete analysis here.
The idea that it is some conspiracy theory to question the circumstances of Seth Rich’s death is just ludicrous. A guy, who appears to have been involved in penetrating the DNC server, is murdered and it is supposed to be crazy to ask if it is related? It is crazy not to be asking that question. Why did the Washington DC police stand down from this investigation?
FBI crime stats show that random murders are a rare event. It happens but it is not common at all. The timing adds to the improbability. A random murder occurring just as a major scandal was erupting at Seth Rich’s workplace seems highly improbable. It’s possible that they are unrelated, but it would be a very unlikely coincidence.
As noted previously, the implications of all of this are staggering. It would appear that the Mueller investigation simply ignored or chose not to look into facts readily available. There were some 40 FBI agents working on the case along 19 attorneys. One can only speculate why there is no mention of information that was commonly available in the public sphere.
If all of this is true, the entire narrative around the DNC “hack” is proven to have been intentionally created. The entire integrity of the DOJ, FBI and Special Counsel investigations disintegrates. The investigation will be shown to be solely about trying to trap PDJT into one trumped up charge or another. In other words, it was an attempt by DC elite to overthrow the sitting government of the United States of America. And it is ongoing today.
Is this why Robert Mueller “delayed” his appearance before Congress? Did he need to meet with the Democrats to map out a new strategy for answering questions about this before he will testify? Will he actually appear? What will the Democrats’ strategy be? Recently, Rep. Adam Schiff has resurfaced to try to create some smoke screen about all of this. I wonder who else will be involved.
