Memory Fails

      Comments Off on Memory Fails

Recently we have seen more and more memory fails among elite Democratic politicians.  Joe Biden’s are legendary and appear to be fueled by being in the early stages of dementia.  There have been a number of others who appear to be inflicted with the same type of memory lapses.

Two days after a six-block section of Seattle, Washington, was commandeered by looters and rioters, Governor Inslee said he was not aware of the CHAZ section of Seattle.  This was despite the fact the group had forced police to abandon a precinct two days before and had stormed City Hall the day before.  So, Inslee was saying he did not know that the local government of one of Washington’s largest cities had allowed a section of its city to be taken over by anarchists.

Any governor who isn’t aware of such an insurrection in his state two days after it happened is either willfully ignorant or has serious cognitive issues.  In either case that governor is totally unfit to be the state’s leader.

Jim Clyburn (D-SC), a member of the House and third ranking member of the Democratic caucus, came out with an absolutely incredible statement after the rioting, looting and burning in our nation’s capital.

Clyburn said,

“The only time I saw violence in Washington DC was those horseback riders driving people off the streets.  That’s when I saw it.”

This means that the rioting, looting, arson and attacks against police that everyone saw with their own eyes did not happen. The burned-out cars, the burning buildings and churches, the rampant looting, and the 150 law enforcement officers taken to the hospital must have been staged and made up.

Again, anyone who would say such a thing in the face of such obvious evidence is either willfully ignorant or has serious mental issues.  Either way this should make him unfit to be a member of the House.

Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has now joined the ranks of those who appear to have serious mental deficiencies.  On Thursday, Nadler made the claim that Antifa was imaginary.  Yes, Nadler actually said that.

The complete sentence was,

“Instead, [Republicans’] amendments — I’ve given you about half of them just listed here — were errant nonsense, off-topic, dealing with imaginary things like antifa and completely negating the entire purpose of the bill.”

Jim Jordan (R-OH) did not let Nadler get away with such a blatant lie.  Jordan eviscerated Nadler.

Among other statements, Jordan noted,

“They are far from imaginary.  And there are people from every major city in this country who know that, and yet the chair of the Judiciary Committee just made that statement. That is scary!”

Just what planet is Jerrold Nadler living on?  Nadler is certainly not living on the same planet where the son of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, the top law enforcement official in that state, has pledged support to antifa. Then there’s the  undercover video captured by Project Veritas.  It showed a journalist posing as an Antifa recruit being taught about “destroying your enemy” and urging him to “practice things like an eye gouge” because “it takes very little pressure to injure someone’s eyes.”

Gabriel Nadales, a former member of Antifa, responded on “The Ingraham Angle” Friday to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

“That’s just false.  I mean, the only thing that’s imaginary here is Representative Nadler’s sense of justice. I mean, the protests I attended … weren’t imaginary. Also, the windows that I regrettably broke, they weren’t imaginary.

“Yet every single time that we have left-wing politicians … that deny and ignore and even justify Antifa violence, it’s only going to continue to grow.”

If Nadler is of sound mind, why would he say what he said?  Perhaps, if he pretends to be ignorant of Antifa’s existence, he thinks, as Tucker Carlson noted, he won’t have to answer questions about Antifa being the “armed militia of the Democratic Party.”

A write-up in The Washington Times explained Antifa’s battle plan in detail:

“What makes the shadowy group unique is its willingness to use of violence, what antifa organizers and sympathizers call ‘direct’ action in support of the Marxist-Leninist agenda. That often involves setting fires, looting, throwing bricks and bottles at police, and in one case the apparent use of a milkshake laced with quick-dry cement in attacking an opponent in the face.”

This is the group that Nadler says is imaginary.  I suppose if he were to tell this lie often enough, then he thinks he might not have to condemn Antifa’s actions that are wreaking havoc across the country.  Antifa, along with BLM leaders, hijacked a peaceful protest and set the country on fire.

This is imbecilic.  For Nadler to say what he did in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary demonstrates some serious cognitive and/or moral issues.  Either way Nadler is unfit to be an elected official anywhere in the country at any level.