Blood On His Hands

Does Dr. Fauci have blood on his hands?  Yesterday I talked about the infiltration of our government by people who have only one thing in mind and that is self-enrichment through overseeing policy, manipulating such policy and trading on the knowledge gained therein.

Today, I will take a closer look at the absolutely corrupt actions that led to the deaths of thousands of people.  And sadly, that scrutiny starts with Dr. Fauci.  I say sadly because Dr. Fauci’s high school education was at one of the best private high schools in the country.  The school’s mission is encapsulated in the motto “Men for Others.”  It is about transforming Catholic young men into generous leaders with a passion for service.  Dr. Fauci appears to have forgotten all of the lessons imparted during his time there.

More and more people have come to distrust medicine and the public health system because of the endless falsehoods during the pandemic that have emanated from various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies.  And Dr. Fauci has been front and center in a lot of this.

The biggest, long-lasting lie perpetrated during the pandemic has been the denigration of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for early home/outpatient treatment. And the leader of the charge against HCQ has been Dr. Fauci.

What did Dr. Fauci know about HCQ and when did he know it?

A recent study in India about the effectiveness of HCQ as a prophylactic noted the following:

One of the co-authors of the study, Dr Raj Kamal Choudhry said, “In the 1985-86 edition of Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine [a highly recommended book for students studying medicine in medical colleges], Dr Fauci wrote that HCQ worked an anti-viral agent despite being an anti-malarial drug. There was no Covid-19 back then. HCQ’s anti-viral properties were known.”

So, in 1985, Dr. Fauci knew about the anti-viral properties of HCQ.  Did he forget about this?  After all, that was 35 years ago.  Let’s roll forward to 2005.

Research done by the National Institutes of Health at that time (Dr. Fauci was the director) showed that chloroquine was highly effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus (SAR-CoV).  COVID-19 is also a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2.  It is genetically related to SARS-CoV.  It shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies.

As noted over at True Pundit:

The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis added) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci has known for 15 years that chloroquine and its even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus.

So once again PDJT was right.  HCQ is a game changer.  So many American deaths and so much suffering could have been prevented.  I have a family member who contracted the illness last year.  The doctor said there was no treatment and to stay home.  He had the illness for more than a month and did survive.  How much suffering (and he did suffer) could have been avoided if HCQ had been a treatment option for his doctor?

Why did Dr. Fauci resist the use of the drug when frontline doctors (Dr. Zelenko, etc.) were reporting effective results?  Why did Dr. Fauci denigrate the results as anecdotal when these were doctors reporting actual results following a prescribed course of treatment?  Why did this follow-the-science hypocrite suddenly decide that HCQ could not be widely used, despite extremely positive results from both research and frontline doctors?  Why did the media smear doctors who spoke out?  Why did medical boards threaten doctors with the loss of their licenses if they prescribed this drug?  Why did social media attempt to cancel anyone who did not toe the line regarding HCQ?

I think most of us know the reason.  There is an old saying that is true over and over.  Follow the money.  The media, Dr. Fauci and others were protecting the global market for COVID vaccines.  HCQ would have trashed the market for vaccines.  As disgusting as it may sound, as difficult as it may be for normal people to comprehend, protecting that market was more important than saving lives.  And it continues to be so.

HCQ is an effective prophylactic as has been shown by numerous studies.  It is a cheap and safe way to stay protected.  In view of the endless reports of deaths after getting jabbed (now totaling some 30,000 in the US) and other serious health impacts, HCQ seems to be a better alternative than the vaccines.  It has been used for many decades and is a very safe drug.

However, everyone from the Avatar in the White House on down continues to push the vaccines on people.  This is unconscionable.  As Peter Navarro said, these people truly have “blood on their hands.”

The American public deserves the truth. Withholding HCQ was a politically motivated act that caused thousands of unnecessary deaths.  This is no different that what Mao, Josef Stalin and other dictators did during their reigns.  When many people know the truth, maybe the judicial system will prosecute those who are actually responsible for so many deaths.  Hopefully Dr. Fauci will be near the top of that list.