Do Adverse Reactions Matter?

      Comments Off on Do Adverse Reactions Matter?

It is rumored that at least one of the “leaky vaccines” will receive full approval from the FDA on Monday.  Yes, from the FDA that is often the last drug review body on the planet to grant full approval to anything.  It appears that the FDA has expedited the approval process for Pfizer’s creation.  If it does grant approval, one of the real questions has to be why is the FDA ignoring adverse reactions to the mRNA gene therapy?

Those who have been following the real news story on adverse reactions here in this country know that the VAERS data base is reporting that more than 12,000 people have died after getting jabbed with the mRNA vaccine.  Patrick Wood, an economist by education, a financial analyst and writer by profession and an American Constitutionalist by choice, recently appeared on Steve Bannon’s War Room to discuss adverse reactions.  His presentation is scary to say the least.

 

Please note that Wood said this:

The data above is from the EU version of our VAERS data base.  At mid July, just under 19,000 have DIED after being jabbed.  1.8 million people with serious injuries including more than 300,000 with nervous system disorders.  Woods goes on to note that ordinarily actual reporting in these systems is much less than the real-world totals.

Woods, at the prompting of Bannon, goes on to note that, contrary to the propaganda arms of MSNBC and CNN, the data in these systems is not just raw data.  Some checking and verification of the data is done.  The problem in the US is that VAERS is a purely voluntary system for doctors.  There is no requirement for doctors to report adverse reactions.

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA gene therapy, updated Wood’s numbers about the EU to 20,525 deaths and 1.9 million injuries as of July 31st.  He further reported that studies done in the US estimate vaccine-related deaths at between 72,000 and 180,000.  These numbers come from Mathew Crawford.

“I am currently working on several analyses (including state-by-state U.S. data) that may or may not be consistent with the theory that there are at least 72,000 vaccine-induced deaths in the U.S. (my current pin is 140,000, but with a high error bar).”

“Outside of the mortality question, the serious AEs are likely on the order of 2.5 millionin the U.S. alone…”

“While VAERS is still backlogged, and reports piling up, the COVID-19 vaccines already resulted in the following per dose scale factors (according to the same researcher) of reports relative to the H1N1 vaccine, which was itself considered among the more dangerous of vaccines.

  • Deaths: 35.1x
  • Life Threatening Events: 13.2x
  • Permanent Disability: 19.5x
  • Hospitalization: 13.5x
  • Emergency Room Visits: 18.2x
  • Serious Adverse Events: 14.8x
  • Not Serious Adverse Events: 14.9x

The H1N1 vaccines were several times deadlier, with similarly higher severe adverse events and hospitalizations than typical flu vaccines.”

You can read his entire analysis here.

Note that the death rate for the mRNA therapy is 35 times higher than it was for the Swine Flu vaccine.  And that vaccine’s death rate was much higher than other flu vaccines.  Why is the FDA ignoring the deaths in this country and overseas?  How many people have to die before we pull the plug on this failed experiment?

Just how many adverse reactions are there in this country?  Dr. Peter McCullough said it takes up to 30 minutes to submit just one case because of all of the info that is required.  He says the system is so backlogged only God knows what the real numbers are.

It is obvious that those in power want everyone to get jabbed BEFORE a truly unified resistance can be created.  The Avatar in the White House has stated over and over that the vaccines are “safe and effective.”  With all of the above information available to the experts, just what is the standard for “safe and effective?”  What risk-benefit analysis can the FDA point to that demonstrates the mRNA gene therapy does more good than harm?

From where this writer sits, it certainly seems that the pending approval is all about politics.  Enormous political pressure is being brought to bear on the FDA.  The drug companies are making money hand over fist.  How much of that is being re-cycled to elite politicians around the planet?

Oh, and one last question for the FDA.  Where are the studies of long-term side effects?