Maricopa County in Arizona has entered the news cycle again. Arizona resident Liz Harris has conducted a canvass of the voters in Maricopa County. This canvass is separate from the forensic audit being conducted under the authority of the Arizona Senate. This is an interesting walk in the deep weeds. And the results are demonstrating massive fraud. Again, remember this is not the results of the forensic audit. That is still to come.
The Democrats are petrified about the public finding out what took place in Maricopa County in connection with the last election. This has been obvious from the very beginning. They have employed various tactics trying to avoid sunlight being shown on the results in Maricopa County.
Liz Harris organized an independent canvass of voters in Maricopa County to avoid having the results of the authorized forensic audit being sequestered by the DOJ. How would this happen?
Sundance explains:
“…the U.S. Department of Justice was prepared to launch federal “voter intimidation” charges against the auditing firm if they contacted any voters in person. This is one of the problems when attempting to verify voting authenticity to votes counted.
If a single Arizona voter contacted was to file a complaint about the contact – the auditors would be subject to a federal investigation; and that investigation itself throws a bag over the entire audit. It is a legal catch-22 deployed by the Lawfare group inside the DOJ civil rights division.”
There is no question that the DOJ was prepared to do this. They sent a letter to the President of the Arizona Senate threatening such prosecutions. This is how politicized the DOJ has become.
Is a canvass necessary? Absolutely! The fact that someone voted is a matter of public record. There is nothing illegal about accessing that data. Who they voted for is secret. Confirming that people voted or did not vote is part of the process of ensuring integrity of our elections.
The DOJ might have jumped the gun with their threat. People in a panic sometimes do that. With the threat hanging over the Senate’s audit, an independent group doing the same thing, that is, a canvass, shields the forensic audit from this charge.
What were the results of the canvass?
Definitions:
- Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
- Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
Please note that not every registered voter in Maricopa County was interviewed. Statistical limits on lost votes are from 165,518 to 180,970 with a confidence level of 95%. This represents a high degree of confidence in the numbers presented. One precinct (Warner) was canvassed in its entirety (more than 7,000 registered voters). Partial canvasses were conducted on the remaining precincts.
The canvass team amassed sworn affidavits supporting these findings.
Ghost votes are connected to mail-in ballots. These are ballots cast by an individual who did not reside at the address listed. Since, by law, mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, who cast the ballot?
The report outlined a specific example to illustrate the problem.
In order to avoid a DOJ investigation throwing a blanket over the results, the canvass developed a script for the canvassers to follow. There was a large emphasis placed on being polite and non-aggressive.
Using this approach helped to separate the real canvassers from paid operatives who were out in the county to see if they could stir up a DOJ investigation. Sundance notes:
Ms. Harris describes a very familiar tactic previously used by the SEIU operatives (purple orcs we called them), where they impersonate audit canvassers (and/or election workers) and actually do intentionally intimidate the voter (very aggressive). The canvassed voter then thinks they have been intimidated by an audit worker and reports that conduct to the DOJ who in turn use that evidence against the audit team to file lawsuits. We saw this exact type of operation carried out by the SEIU in Pennsylvania circa 2007 as the DNC wanted to keep the RNC under a consent decree (long story). This is also how Bob Creamer operated when he was planting fake protestors in Trump rallies on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
This is another indication of the desperate situation that the Democrats find themselves in. However, it is not unexpected. We are at war with evil. There are no limits to what might be done to keep this from seeing the light of day.
The following is an interview that Liz Harris did describing the effort.
This is the report put out by this group.
Now no one can rationally deny that massive fraud took place in Arizona. And who knew about it? Why did one major network announce Arizona going for Biden when only 10% of the vote was in?
Again, it is important to note a clear distinction between what Liz Harris has done with her canvassing and what the forensic audit is doing. Let’s get the results of that out in the public square soon.