Does real world data mean anything? Apparently to the Dr. Fauci’s of the world, the only time real world data is useful is when it supports the narrative being put forward by them. If, however, such data is in disagreement with their scripted narrative, it must be censored and destroyed. And those who would engage in bringing such data to the attention of the public must be destroyed as well.
What we are seeing at the highest levels of our public health agencies (think NIH, CDC, FDA) is not science. It is scientism. Its current head is the sainted Dr. Fauci who controls most of the government’s response to health matters in America. The ability of real science to function properly is jeopardized by scientism, not promoted by it. Those who receive funding via the NIH, worship at its altar to the detriment of the public health of all Americans.
Steve Kirsch, a former high tech entrepreneur, has been a gold mine for real world data. He is using such data to ask questions of those who would control every aspect of our lives. Kirsch has offered a $1 million incentive for health authorities to go on record and have a discussion about the evidence that is summarized in his article “Incriminating Evidence.” He has no takers.
Kirsch notes:
Since nobody inside the CDC, NIH, or FDA will talk to me or any members of my team of experts, I have tried to discuss the evidence summarized in this document with the members of the outside committee members of the CDC and FDA. I offered them $1M to take a meeting (or I will donate it to a charity of their choice if they want). They all refused. I have no idea why. They won’t tell me. I didn’t even get a counter offer. It’s so hard to give away a million dollars nowadays.
Of course, his comment that he has no idea why they won’t meet with him is tongue in cheek. He knows exactly why they won’t meet with him or his crew of experts. As Kirsch notes, they are hiding something big.
I will be excerpting from his article. You can find the whole article below. It is a treasure trove of real world data.
Incriminating Evidence
Those of us who have done a deep dive into this mess, know just how bad it is. Many of us believed, just as Steve Kirsch did, that, if a strong data-driven case was made, it would prevail over the lies and obfuscation. That has not happened. As Kirsch notes:
Consider the following real-life example: 4 neurologists in the same practice. One realizes that out of 20,000 patients they have 2,000 vaccine injured. She cannot convince her partners of this no matter how hard she tries. They all think it is bad luck. Even after the other docs get the vaccine and one of them is severely vaccine injured, he still wants to get the booster to protect himself from COVID.
My red pill doctor is amazed that her partners are so brainwashed that they cannot see what is going on; it is obvious to her.
So that’s how bad it is and how difficult it is to change minds.
When people are fooled, they find it is very difficult to admit this. In the example above fully 10% of those vaxxed suffered an injury including death after receiving the jab. This is not bad luck. This is clearly something else.
There has been an aura around science and, in particular, the medical profession. In some people’s eyes, scientists and medical professionals are seen as very high-quality experts, almost gods in some cases. People do not want to believe that gods would lie to them.
Instead people will try to rationalize what happened. In this situation they do not want to believe that they done something that may have injured themselves and/or others who depend on them. This includes medical professionals. Just imagine a parent who is faced with the prospect that he/she may have permanently damaged his/her child by having the child jabbed.
As far as kids are concerned, even the top WHO expert has now caved to the real dangers that real science has exposed and agrees that children below the age of 12 should NOT be jabbed.
https://twitter.com/IanLyne3/status/1483639528225005570
Just how bad is the situation with regard to the therapies that the CDC is calling a vaccine?
Before we dive into that, let’s be reminded that the CDC changed the definition of vaccine to try to fit it into the effects that were being seen in the real world. In the spring of 2021 the CDC’s definition of vaccine was what it always had been. That is, a vaccine is “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”
When it became obvious to most people that the “vaccines” were not producing immunity, the CDC redefined vaccine. It became “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” Now it appears that not only does the therapy not produce, not protect from serious illness and death but, in fact, actually promotes infection from the newer variants. Will the CDC once again change the definition of vaccine?
The VAERS database is a source of information about the mess we find ourselves in. Because this database is showing hundreds of thousands of injuries including death, the powers that be have tried to diminish the veracity of reports in the VAERS database.
Dr. Fauci and others in power have pointed out that VAERS is a voluntary system and that anyone can enter a report without having to be vetted. This is a tricky piece of flim-flam. It is true that VAERS is voluntary and that anyone can file a report. However, two other things are also true.
First, VAERS has always been this way. It was not suddenly changed to accommodate the mRNA therapy rollout. There are literally hundreds of thousands of reports in the system. Did people suddenly change their behavior and start filing these reports?
Second, it takes a significant amount of time to file a report. This is not some deal where you can go in and a minute or two later be done. Again this has always been this way. You must persevere in order to be recorded. IMO this is a feature of the system. I believe that when the VAERS system was built, it was done this way to minimize the amount of reports that would be filed. Current estimates are that it collects from 1% to 10% of the actual number of injuries.
Despite the difficulty in filing, hundreds of thousands of reports have been made. More reports of injuries after being jabbed than all of the previous 30 years COMBINED. Are we seeing a spectacular number of “black swan” events? I think not.
Kirsch notes the breadth of injuries being reported:
People will eventually start to make the link between vaccination and the sudden, unexpected onset of neurological, cardiovascular, or immunological symptoms such as:
-
death (including death in your sleep)
-
-
-
pulmonary embolism
-
-
Bell’s Palsy
-
-
peripheral neuropathy
-
severe and persistent muscle spasms
-
menstrual issues (high flow, low flow, start, stop, timing)
-
Re-emergence of latent disease (cancers, shingles, etc.)
-
Worsening diabetes
-
and hundreds more serious adverse events that are obvious in VAERS but where the CDC is staying silent
In decades past, any drug therapy that was showing small numbers of these kinds of adverse events would have been yanked. Why weren’t the mRNA therapies?
Another problem with the “vaccines” is they do not work. There may be some marginal benefit for a month or two. Even that is being questioned more as time passes. Data coming from multiple sources show that those who have been jabbed are twice as likely to become infected with COVID as those who have refused the jab. So, the problem is getting worse not better. Where is the return to normalcy that was promised?
Kirsch reports:
Here are two charts, one showing cases in the US, the other showing infection rate of the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated by age. Both are clear indicators that our interventions are making things worse, not better. Instead of doubling-down on our interventions, why not start listening to the people who were trying to warn the world about how dangerous these vaccines are?
The data from the UK and Scotland shows vaccinated people are more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people. The mandates are making things worse, not better.
This is happening in the US as well. By vaccinating people, we are making them more likely to be infected which is why case rates are through the roof:
Think about what these charts are showing. The rolling average of new cases is way beyond anything we saw last year. And the jabbed are the ones who are getting infected the most. For most age cohorts, the rate is double the rate for those who have refused the jab.
And this effect is not limited to Great Britain and America. Israel, the only quadruple-jabbed country in the world, just established a new record for daily COVID cases.
Please note that Australia with all their lockdowns and mandates is just behind Israel.
Kirsch goes onto talk about asymptomatic spread (there are no documented cases) as well as the toxicity of parts of the mRNA therapies. Specifically, Kirsch reports on the toxicity of lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein itself. The short story here is that there are many studies in peer-reviewed literature attesting to the dangers. How can the CDC come out and say the “vaccines” are harmless? Where is their proof, their gold standard studies that attest to the safety of the “vaccines?”
Up to this point Kirsch has just been laying the groundwork for his expose on the safety of these therapies. IMO what he lays out next is criminal in nature and deserves the severest penalties that the law will allow.
Vaccine safety
If the CDC is correct and the vaccine is safe, how do they explain over 20,000 deaths reported in VAERS worldwide in a year? That is unprecedented. It is more deaths in one year than for all 70 vaccines combined over the past 30 years since VAERS was created.
The CDC is supposed to investigate each one of these deaths to determine whether or not it could be caused by the vaccine. Why are they not making these investigations public?!? This should be troubling to every American. Not a single death investigation has been made public. 0 for 20,000. That’s stunning. And the mainstream media, they aren’t asking any questions about this. How can there not be a single news story or op-ed about this?
As far as anyone knows, the CDC has not done an autopsy on any patient who died after vaccination. Not a single one. Why not?
This fact that there have been no autopsies has been known but not reported by Big Media. Why not? Why is the CDC not following their own protocols? Who benefits from this “lapse” on the part of the CDC?
20,000 deaths is the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Remember VAERS significantly underreports the number of real world events. One statistician’s survey has used 12 methods to estimate the real number. That survey has consistently shown 150,000 to 200,000 deaths.
Kirsch goes on:
Overall, the safety evidence is very troubling. All of these references show that the vaccines are unsafe.
-
Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age. Since it is the healthy patients who opt for the vaccine, it can’t be explained by healthy-patient bias. This is a stunning observation, but taken alone, like most evidence, it is not definitive because of age confounding. A more in-depth analysis shows that at best, there is no benefit to vaccination at all, but it comes at “the expense of hundreds of thousands of serious adverse events in the UK alone (possibly over a million at this point), and several billion pounds from the public treasury.”
-
It’s not just England that people under 60 are dying at double the rate. It’s happening in the US too. The CEO of a big insurance company in Indiana admitted to a 40% increase in deaths in ages 18-64 after the vaccines rolled out. That cannot happen by chance. Something is killing these people. If it isn’t the vaccine, then what is? It isn’t COVID. They’ve ruled that out. The insurance company didn’t track vaccination status. So let’s say it is the vaccinated dying at double the rate of the unvaccinated. Then if around half the people are vaccinated, that can explain the result they got; it is consistent with the stats in England.
-
Prime age mortality SPIKED by 50% across multiple states during the year of the “life-saving” covid-19 vaccine. It’s not just Indiana. The dramatic increase in mortality among those under 50 is happening across all 50 states. These live saving vaccines are not preventing infection, nor are they saving lives. They are doing exactly the opposite.
-
Using 12 independent methods (only one of them using VAERS), we can estimate that over 150,000 Americans have died from the vaccine in 2021
-
The number of significant vaccine adverse events are thousands more than the CDC will admit. These are types of events, not rates. In other words the CDC says there are only a few serious events like myocarditis. But VAERS says there are thousands of different types of adverse events that are elevated by these vaccines.
-
Myocarditis rates may be as common as 1 in 100 teenage boys, which is more than 100X higher than the CDC claims for the vaccine (1 in 13,000). One of us is lying. My rate can be derived from the VAERS data and also confirmed at a school near where I live. Here’s the chart from Jessica’s paper that was published and then improperly censored by the publisher of the journal after it appeared. Remember, the CDC says the myocarditis risk is only slightly elevated with the COVID vaccines. This looks like “slightly elevated” to you, right? It does to them.
-
Pfizer’s own study shows 24% more people died in the vaccine group than the placebo group. The abstract of the paper didn’t mention this; it was focused on the lower infection rate for vaccinated patients.
-
VAERS risk-benefit analysis shows that the vaccines cannot be justified for any age range: they kill more people than they save for all age rates.
-
For young children, the risk benefit is off the charts. For ages 5 to 11, we’ll kill 117 kids for every child we might save
-
Over 1,000 studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals say the vaccines are dangerous
-
How do we explain the higher rate of death of athletes after the vaccines rolled out?
-
There is evidence that the vaccines have increased the incidence of prion diseases.
-
We don’t know what the long-term effects are. See for example, MIT Scientist: Covid Vaccines May Cause Diseases in ’10 to 15 years’ (Exclusive Video)
-
Thailand experienced a 33% drop in the number of births in 2021 compared to 2020. This is interesting because you’d expect that lockdowns would have increased the number of births, not decreased them. England stopped tracking the same statistic in August 2021 for unknown reasons… maybe they thought it was too boring? The drop in births is not limited to Thailand. In the Philippines the same thing is happening: “a catastrophic drop in the number of babies born.”
The decrease in the number of babies being born is especially troubling. In the two countries mentioned above, there was a 1/4 to 1/3 decrease. That’s incredible since one might think that more babies would be conceived during a lockdown period. What is the cause? Where are the feverish studies being done to uncover the source of this catastrophe?
Kirsch does a deep dive into brain hemorrhages.
How does the CDC explain all the reports of brain hemorrhages in young people with no head trauma? All of these cases have one thing in common: they happened shortly after the child took the jab. If these kids didn’t die from the vaccine, then what is the more likely cause?
-
Baby Girl Dies From Brain Hemorrhage 5 Days After Pfizer Vaccine Shot
-
Grieving mother in Trinidad grieves over her son who got jabbed and within hours he’s dead. “He was bleeding… he was bleeding in his brain.” Trinidad officials ignore her and encourage everyone to get vaccinated.
-
The CDC did an in-depth investigation of the deaths of 12-17 year olds after the vaccine. Two of the 14 kids died from intracranial hemorrhages. This is extremely unusual since kids this age rarely die from intracranial hemorrhages. There are zero records in the entire 30 year history of VAERS of a kid in this age range dying of intracranial hemorrhage. Zero! Yet shortly after giving these vaccines to kids, we have two deaths from this cause. How do they explain that? Bad luck? Is it also bad luck that two kids died from pulmonary embolisms (PE) right after they started giving the vaccines to this age group? In the 30 year history of VAERS, only two kids died from PE. Also, statistics would have predicted only two natural deaths for the period analyzed for that age range. There were 14 deaths. This didn’t raise any alarm bells and they didn’t even mention it. They never addressed the cause of the excess deaths. They simply reported that kids died and changed the topic with no mention of the fact that the causes of death were highly unusual. Details of the shoddy analysis of the CDC is here. Please read it. When we kill our children and completely fail to investigate the cause of their deaths, we have a society that is morally bankrupt.
-
The VAERS database clearly shows that intracranial hemorrhages are up by over 79X from baseline rates and up an incredible 954X baseline for pulmonary embolism. Yet the CDC doesn’t recognize either of these as risk factors for the vaccines. Multiple kids have died from these and the CDC can’t see a pattern. How do they explain the deaths?
How indeed? I am certain their answer will be that they are studying these incidents. Just as they are still studying these deaths that an autopsy ruled to be from the “vaccine.”
-
Jacob Clynick, a 13-year old from Minnesota who died of cardiac arrest on June 20, 2021, just 3 days after his second Pfizer shot. The CDC never investigated the cause.
-
The son of Ernest Ramirez was confirmed by Peter McCullough to have been caused by the vaccine. The CDC is silent. Ernest can’t get them to respond. Instead, FEMA is offering him money to change the cause of death from the vaccine to COVID. This is unethical, but that is how the government operates.
-
Exclusive: Autopsy Confirms 26-Year-Old’s Death From Myocarditis Directly Caused by Pfizer COVID Vaccine. The CDC is silent once again.
There are many more of course. This is just a few of the most high profile cases in which it was clearly determined that the vaccine caused the death and the CDC looked the other way when asked to confirm the death.
Kirsch goes on to talk about other unusual things happening around the world. He touched on the European figure skating championships which saw many skaters fall. IVF clinics that started having significant problems after the rollout of the mRNA therapies. Florian Dagoury, the world’s top static freediver, complained that his abilities declined severely after getting the vax.
The one that caught my eye was about a significant increase in traffic fatalities concurrent with the rollout.
The US Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported “the largest six-month increase ever recorded in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System’s history. An estimated 20,160 people died in motor vehicle crashes in the first half of 2021, up 18.4% over 2020. That’s the largest number of projected fatalities in that time period since 2006.” (see here: https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/usdot-releases-new-data-showing-road-fatalities-spiked-first-half-2021).
Kirsch talked about people driving on straight roads in good weather who just seemed to drive off the road into trees for no apparent reason. I have personal experience with this. A friend of mine who has been jabbed multiple times did just that. He ran off the road into trees for no apparent reason. Fortunately, his injuries were minor.
Kirsch’s next focus is efficacy. He lists 13 studies that have been done. They all show the same thing. The more you vaccinate, the worse the outcomes.
-
UK Government Data proves the Covid-19 Vaccines DOUBLE your chances of catching Covid-19. No age confounding on this one. This will be hard for anyone to explain.
-
Scotland data clearly shows the vaccines are making things worse.
-
New big data study of 145 countries show COVID vaccines makes things worse (cases and deaths)
-
-
-
The Denmark study (shows that against Omicron, we need to vaccinate people every 60 days or so and after that the vaccine efficacy goes negative). A Reuters fact check cannot change that fact.
-
German government data (this is from The Expose and was based on the German government data at the time it was written. The German government then changed the data after the article revealed the problem which made the problem go away.
-
-
-
-
-
Florida: Highest Rates of Infection Occurring in Counties with Highest Vaccination Rates
-
The 10th item on the list might be the scariest one. The study suggests that the more you get jabbed, the greater the chances that you will develop a new form of AIDS.
There is much more here that Kirsch talks about. He covers mask and lockdowns with the same result. There is no scientific evidence that such things work. He provides links to studies that show just the opposite.
This has never been about the safety of the public health. If it was, there would have been no suppression of information about effective treatments for COVID. It has always been about putting the jackboot on the throat of the people and making them comply to whatever the government says.
How many hundreds of thousands of people died needlessly because of the actions of those who are supposedly in jobs protecting the public health? This is fraud, malfeasance and corruption all rolled into one big mess.
Kirsch provides some examples of fraud and malfeasance:
-
The drug companies have FULL liability protection. They cannot be sued if you die or are disabled. Why is the liability protection necessary if the vaccines are “safe and effective” as the CDC claims? I’m still baffled by this.
-
There is no stopping condition for the vaccine experiment. That is unheard of. We could kill 1M kids and they wouldn’t stop it. The mainstream press never asks this question (and they never will). I’ve asked members of Congress, but they refuse to answer.
-
There is no transparency of the data. Even the BMJ is up in arms about this with three editors saying this is wrong.
-
The FDA originally asked a court to allow them to release the Pfizer documents over 75 years so we’ll all be dead before we can see what they are injecting us with. How is this in the public interest?
-
The damage from the vaccines is irreversible. Once your child is dead, you can’t bring them back. Once you damage your heart or brain, it cannot be repaired. The vaccines were never properly tested by the FDA in animals. We don’t even know the amount, distribution, and duration of the spike protein in primates. It was never measured. Basic measures of clotting and heart damage (d-dimer and troponin) post-vaccine still are not known, probably because they know it is really bad and don’t want anyone to know. It is inexcusable that they have not required the drug companies to measure and report this information.
-
I have tried incessantly to get a recorded video call with anyone from the FDA, CDC, and NIH to explain the evidence in this document. They claim I’m wrong and refuse to meet with me or any member of my team. Even more troubling is that when we offered to share all the adverse event analysis we did in VAERS, they wouldn’t even respond to our offer. They have no interest at all in seeing safety data that goes against the narrative of safe and effective.
-
The CDC told people that cloth and surgical masks work to protect them from COVID. They do no such thing. All of the randomized trials for these masks and COVID showed they had no statistically significant effect. That’s why the CDC never references these studies because they don’t support their narrative. The public is misled into believing they are protected when they aren’t. They could have recommended P100 masks at the outset, but they didn’t do that. They left people without protection, but thinking they had protection. That’s really bad.
-
The NIH, CDC, and FDA all unethically suppressed early treatment. They minimally funded these studies. When fluvoxamine was shown to work, they refused to issue and EUA and the NIH rated the drug neutral. They did similar things for vitamin D, ivermectin, HCQ, etc. All early treatments using inexpensive repurposed drugs that worked were suppressed. What are the chances that none of these drugs listed on that page work? It’s virtually zero.
-
The US government deliberately withheld monoclonal antibodies that some physicians believe could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives had they been aggressively made available and promoted.
-
Maddie de Garay was a participant in the Pfizer 12-15 year old clinical trial. She’s paralyzed likely for life and her paralysis was reported as “abdominal pain” by Pfizer. Had it been correctly reported, the drug wouldn’t have been approved. FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock promised to investigate why Maddie’s paralysis wasn’t reported correctly in the Pfizer clinical trial, but Maddie’s parents were never contacted by anyone from any agency looking to investigate the matter.
-
When you are vaccine injured, the NIH has no clue whatsoever for how to treat you to restore you to health. They know this. But they are not disclosing this to the public. The public still thinks the vaccines are perfectly safe.
-
When John Su, the CDC’s VAERS expert, reports numbers from VAERS, he never calculates the underreporting factor (URF). He deliberately misleads everyone by failing to note that the true event rates are close to 100X higher than he reports. Even worse is when the FDA is contacted by a former NY Times reporter who asks for the URF and the document showing the URF calculation, the reporter is stonewalled and never given a response. This is critical since the URF is required in order to do even the most basic risk-benefit analysis. It is astonishing that neither the VRBPAC nor ACIP committee members never asked for this. They are corrupt as well. There is no excuse for this. The mainstream press isn’t asking any questions on this as usual.
-
Pfizer claimed that all the deaths in the vaccine arm were not caused by the vaccine. Seriously? How is that possible? Did they do autopsies? I believe they lied. I’d like to see how they can have a 4X higher rate of death from cardiac arrest in the vaccine group and show conclusively that it wasn’t caused by the vaccine. Did they do a thorough autopsy? This is extremely important and was simply glossed over. People died and as far as we know, the FDA never asked any questions about how they died and how the vaccine could have been ruled out. We are simply told, “Trust us, our employees determined it wasn’t vaccine related.” This is outrageous. Has anyone else called for this other than members of our team of scientists? I think it is pretty damn important that this is not buried. By not producing this analysis and making it public, it erodes public trust in the entire system because these are supposed to be the most scrutinized trials in US history. Not showing the analysis of each death in the treatment group is unacceptable. We want to see how the autopsy results excluded the vaccine as being causal. Where is it? How come nobody in the mainstream medical community is asking about this?
-
The FDA never took a serious look at the Pfizer trial. How can there be 5 times as many dropouts in the treatment group vs. placebo? That is statistically impossible. 311 vs. 60. Those numbers should have been the same if the trial wasn’t gamed. The Pfizer whistleblower admitted that the trial wasn’t blinded; that’s how they can accomplish this:
-
-
The CDC says there are no safety signals from VAERS for the mRNA COVID vaccines other than myocarditis. The VAERS database is flashing RED for thousands of adverse events and the FDA and CDC are ignoring all of them including all of the reasons that the kids died in their 12-17 VAERS study which included cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and pulmonary embolism.
-
The CDC claims nobody has died from the mRNA vaccines. They are lying. They know directly of many cases that have been brought to their attention, but they ignore them, saying they are “investigating” them. Dr. Peter Schirmacher, one of the world’s most respected pathologists, found that 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccination were due to the vaccine. His results were independently confirmed by other German researchers who showed numbers as high as 93% (here and here).
-
Brook Jackson, who worked as a contractor on the Pfizer trial, was appalled by what she observed including the unblinding of personnel on what is supposed to be a double-blind trial. She contacted the FDA in confidence and was surprised that the very next day she was fired. How is that possible if the FDA didn’t leak info to Pfizer?
-
We still do not know the contents of each vaccine. It’s illegal for anyone to have it analyzed. If there is nothing to hide, why can’t we analyze what is in the vials?
It is clear that our public health system is badly corrupted. It is way past time to clean house. We need to start at the top of the pile. Grand juries need to be empaneled. Trials need to be telecast around the world. All those who have been complicit in this fraud need to be exposed and punished.
Thank you, Steve Kirsch, for all the work that you have done to put this together.
Remember, you are not alone. The corrupt cabal at the root of all of this would like you to believe that you are just an insignificant pawn in their attempt to conquer the world. That is not true as evidenced by the Freedom Convoy in Canada. Individuals can make a difference. Do not cave into their attempts to isolate you. Share the pieces that Steve Kirsch has put together far and wide. Let everyone know what the reality is.
We are truly at war with a corrupt nobility who are attempting to enslave us. Fight back. Step up or be whisked away with no chance to defend yourself. Let your anger be seen. That means stepping outside of our comfort zones for how we prefer to act. But it is necessary. If we do not do this, it is quite likely that the greatest and most successful experiment in freedom and governance will be lost.
Godspeed!