Karl Denninger has been a font of data on all things COVID. Denninger publishes facts, not speculation. That alone makes his latest post on the mRNA therapy madness even more scary. And it makes the case that those who forced the jabs on the human race should stand trial for crimes against humanity.
One of the items getting attention lately is the idea that the more you get jabbed with mRNA, the more likely you are to actually become infected with COVID. There are now medical facts that entirely explain why this is happening. Deninnger starts by discussing ADE.
ADE (“Antibody dependent enhancement”) is a fairly poorly-understood thing; most people believe it is confined to making a particular infection more serious than it would otherwise be. Of course having an infection occur when it otherwise would not fits that quite-nicely, but isn’t what people tend to think about.
Now, unfortunately, we have the evidence. Here’s the salient graph.
Now there is some prep needed to even begin to take apart the above graph. The chart shows the response of the body via what are known as IgG# antibodies. These are the last ones that show up in response to an infection.
The study is showing the immune system apparently weakens a crucial part of its Covid response after the third jab. The immune shift causes the body to make relatively more of a less potent kind of antibody to Covid, displacing antibodies that attack the virus more aggressively. The change could heighten the risk of Covid infection and mean that people who are infected suffer longer and have more serious cases.
The body responds in other ways normally. Generally, first is IgA. This is in the mucosa of the nose and could be considered the first line of defense. IgM is the next in line and works hard while you are sick. It fades away some two weeks or so after you have recovered. The IgG antibodies are the long-term ones and show up last. There are multiple subtypes.
Deninnger notes this about the subtypes:
This is very important for human and animal life, because not all things that can elicit a serious immune response should get one. For example: A bee sting. A serious immune response to that could kill you and in people seriously-allergic that’s a real risk. So why don’t most people get a serious immune response?
As it turns out they sort of do, but its focuses in one sort of IgG build, IgG4, which suppresses the cascade of events that cause the body to go after the thing in question and destroy it, along with all the side effects that produces (fever, serious inflammation, etc.). This allows us to tolerate pollen, bee stings, etc. There is a response but it is dialed down. Ig4 causes this.
While I do not understand the technical details, this is just common sense. There are all kinds of pathogens that the body has to deal with every day. The human body has evolved different mechanisms to deal with serious and less serious threats. Not every pathogen that the body encounters needs to be treated like a four-alarm fire.
How does an unvaccinated person deal with the SARS-COV-2 infection?
The chart on the left shows that IgG3 does the lion’s share of the work followed by IgM. This is despite the fact that Ig3 is just 3% of the antibody load (chart on the right). This is how the body should respond to a virus infection like COVID. Note that the Ig4 workload is non-existent which is as it should be.
What happens to people who get jabbed? As it turns out, IgG4 begins to show up after the second jab. Denninger notes:
This gets worse with the breakthrough infections, then it gets worse again with the third shot. Now we have updated findings from breakthrough infections after the third shot. And this will shock you, but it gets worse again.
Well, when you get Covid typically IgG3 is the one that neutralizes most of the virus. IgG1 and 2 do some of the work, but most of it is done by IgG3. You’re not supposed to build an IgG4 response, and with natural infection without vaccination you don’t, thus there’s no inhibition and your response is and remains effective at neutralizing whatever it is. Typical vaccines (e.g. measles) elicit a response that looks exactly like an actual infection because that’s how they’re designed and intended; they use the whole virus and their intent is to make your body think it is being invaded by the real deal and respond as it would to the real deal.
The IgG4 response is different. Let’s note that this response is only occurring in those who have been jabbed with the mRNA therapy. Let’s also remember that the IgG4 response allows the body to tolerate the pathogen that has invaded. While its role in immunity is not well understood, IgG4 does little to help other immune system cells attack viral or bacterial invaders directly. Compared to the other IgGs, it rarely promotes “phagocytosis,” the process by which other immune cells “eat” the virus or bacteria to which the antibody has attached.
The mRNA jabs were not built to mimic an actual infection. As Denninger notes:
They were all crafted to use only part of the virus, and the reason for that is past experience trying to create coronavirus vaccines all ended in failure with many of them producing wild enhancement of the infection instead of protection and in animal testing reliably killed the animals. Thus the decision was made without long-term safety and efficacy testing to use only the spike, with the idea that doing so would prevent the bad outcome.
The bad outcome, of course, is virus infections running wild and many deaths.
This needs to be repeated. No long-term safety and efficacy testing has ever been done using only the spike protein. The human race were guinea pigs for Big Pharma. The reason to shut down news about effective treatments via Dr. Fauci and others was to force the “vaccine” on an unsuspecting population.
This would also allow the transfer of oodles of money from the people to the technocrats in the pharmaceutical industry. The number of doses of vaccine needed would be orders of magnitude higher than any need for doses for an effective treatment.
Were they wrong about this approach? The better question is when did they know they were wrong. The 95% effectiveness disappeared like a late season snowfall on a warm spring day. Boosters were less and less effective over time. Denninger notes:
As it turns out what is now in the data is that IgG3, the component that provides most of the protection against Covid is down to a flat zero by the time you take the third shot while IgG4 which causes the body to tolerate the infection and not clear it skyrockets from nothing prior to the second shot to being extremely high for the third and subsequent.
This has never happened before. No medical treatment of any kind has ever produced a response like this to a virus or bacteria invader. The main neutralizing response to a COVID infection (IgG3) disappears about the time that one gets the third jab.
The human race is now in unknown territory. Will people tolerate persistent infections due to the IgG4 response? Has Big Pharma turned many humans into walking Typhoid Mary’s?
And it could be worse than that. This IgG4 response is homogenous. That is, it is the same in everybody who received the mRNA jab. So, everyone in this position is learning how to tolerate this virus and its mutations. Unvaccinated people have different responses to the virus because each individual is different. The mRNA therapy has caused a homogenous response.
What effect does this have on other respiratory viruses? RNA respiratory viruses all work with pretty similar building blocks. Does cross-reactivity exist? The answer is clear and it is yes. Certain influenza vaccines reduced the risk of a severe COVID infection by 89%.
If influenza antibodies impact SARS2, SARS2 antibodies impact influenza. And if SARS2 antibodies are shifting towards tolerance, that will impact influenza. The impact will merely get more relevant over time, as these other viruses adjust through mutation and natural selection to benefit optimally from this shift towards IgG4.
Denninger notes:
This turns you into a walking virus mutation and production factory, a source of infection to everyone around you and, to the extent that the virus does direct damage to your body systems, and we know the spike does, it also is likely to lead to very severe long-term problems that look like other conditions. Nobody is looking for spike damage specifically in, for example, heart attacks, strokes and pulmonary embolisms, never mind the possibility of potentiating cancer by suppressing immune response if that suppression and tolerance goes beyond Covid, and it very well might. If that’s not bad enough everyone that got jabbed has the same profile of response where the normal situation is that responses differ in different people because our body systems operate slightly differently (we’re all genetically unique.)
In the US alone there are probably a couple hundred million people who have this condition. Anyone want to talk about the excess mortality that persists in all countries with significant mRNA “vaccination?”
Is this condition permanent? No one knows. The human race has entered into a great lab experiment thanks to the likes of Dr. Fauci and others. And our government is still trying to coerce more people into entering this clinical trial. As Denninger notes:
But what we do know, factually, is that when you get infected with Covid post Jab #3 your neutralizing antibody product is a statistical zero while your “tolerance” antibody production shoots the moon. This is exactly backward from what you want to happen and we are now left trying to figure out exactly how badly you screwed both yourself and others.
You can find Denninger’s post below.