The big topic on everybody’s minds is the NYTimes “expose.”
The Spy War: How the C.I.A. Secretly Helps Ukraine Fight Putin
What is probably the real news here is not necessarily the content but rather that it was published at all. Most of the public with any intelligence at all understand that the CIA staged a coup in 2014 to remove a duly elected Ukrainian government from office. This was done because the head of that government was friendly with Russia.
Of course, the NYTimes was not permitted to start with that point of information. It starts just after the coup has been successful and those ousted by the CIA have fled to Russia. It portrays the situation as Ukraine asking for help from the West. This is done to distract the public from the fact of American participation in the overthrowing of the government there.
Ukraine has been the point of the spear in waging war against Russia and Russian interests for at least a decade. Now since Russia has pushed back against this incursion and is destroying the image of Western superiority in matters of war, the politicians need cover from the coming backlash from the public.
The report now admits what Putin has long claimed. That is, the West (US-NATO) has been expanding its military presence into Ukraine. The West’s claim during the Clinton administration that NATO would not expand eastward was not worth the paper it was printed on. And Putin knew this.
From the Times article:
Putin has long blamed Western intelligence agencies for manipulating Kyiv and sowing anti-Russia sentiment in Ukraine.
Toward the end of 2021, according to a senior European official, Putin was weighing whether to launch his full-scale invasion when he met with the head of one of Russia’s main spy services, who told him that the CIA, together with Britain’s MI6, were controlling Ukraine and turning it into a beachhead for operations against Moscow.
Sundance has weighed in on this:
The White House is admitting the CIA and larger IC apparatus, which includes the State Dept., has been heavily controlling all activity in Ukraine for the past decade. The only reason to admit this now very publicly is because they are losing voter support. THIS EXPLAINS WHY BIDEN IS CALLING FOR A WHITE HOUSE MEETING!!
…
The Times is now reporting the USA (State Dept.) was responsible for the coup in Ukraine (color revolution) and took control over political operations in 2014. We have long suspected this; many have reported exactly this reality; however, this is the first time it has all been admitted.
…
… the motive for the outline [the NYT article is an outline of CIA involvement in Ukraine, waging war against Russia] is heavily domestic in nature; meaning, the core of domestic USA politics (specifically the White House) needs to admit that Ukraine is a proxy province in order to retrigger support for policy.
Ukraine’s goose is cooked. It has been since 2022 when, under pressure from the West, they rejected the end of war that was negotiated by Turkey between them and Russia. The pressure was applied by Boris Johnson of the UK. It was a smoke and mirrors operation where Zelenskyy undoubtedly was rewarded with much treasure for staying in the war.
The Ukraine military is collapsing. The recent debacle at Avdeevka is proof of this. After Avdeevka fell, Stepove in the north was captured. This was followed by Severne in the south. Without the infusion of bookoo bucks, the failure of the Ukrainian military will cascade. And it will happen sooner rather than later. Having it happen before the November elections might prove to be a disaster of epic proportions for the Deep State. However, funding is proving difficult to come by in any western country. And no matter what is done, Ukraine is finished. It is only a matter of time.
What this boils down to is this. The neocons are saying that having come this far down this path, we need to keep going. We need the public to understand that Ukraine is an American state and needs our support.
That’s just BS. What is true is that under the Lightbringer, without any vote or authorization that reflects approval from the public, we started a war against the world’s leading nuclear power a decade ago.
One curious aspect of the NYTimes report is the part where it talks about the program during the Trump administration. It appears that most of what was going on in Ukraine was hidden from the President. Did they see Trump as a threat to the illicit operation that was going on?
The real question about this revelation by the NYTimes is why now? A close friend of mine and I used to engage in this exercise often.
Sundance believes it is to rally public support for Ukraine funding. Maybe it is. Getting people to rally around the flag against Russia might work. However, an awful lot of people have become aware of the corrupt nature of our “foreign aid.”
Mark Wauck, the retired FBI agent turned blogger, thinks differently. In his opinion this expose is aimed at Congress and is an attempt to stampede approval of Ukraine funding.
That argument runs like this: If we don’t fund Ukraine the public will blame you, the members of Congress, for the debacle. You, the members of Congress, can’t afford that just before a presidential election when turnout will be high. This is also why the War-on-Russia-as-domestic-jobs-program is being repeatedly floated in public.
Is the Ukraine situation high on the public’s list of concerns despite the constant drumbeat from the press? I think the economy and illegal immigration far outrank Ukraine in the public’s eyes. I also think that being pro-peace is a good position for members of Congress right now. They certainly will not be penalized in the public’s eyes for it.
So, the Deep State is in a bad place. They need to deflect the public’s attention from this debacle. Is this why PDJT is facing 91 sham indictments? Is it to cover up the real crimes that have been committed? Is this why PDJT was impeached during his first term?
Something to consider.