NYTimes Expose

The NYTimes publishes an “investigative” article that shows that the US has had boots on the ground in Ukraine for a long time.  The article also talks about the CIA being there and acting to target the Russian Federation with drones and missiles.  None of this is surprising to anyone who has followed the Ukraine war from its beginnings.  Only those who subsist on the handouts of media outlets like the NYTimes and WaPo would not know this.

From the NYTimes:

[F]or nearly three years before Mr. Trump’s return to power, the United States and Ukraine were joined in an extraordinary partnership of intelligence, strategy, planning and technology whose evolution and inner workings have been known only to a small circle of American and allied officials.

While the public may not have known about the inner workings, it is categorically not true that knowledge of this partnership existence was unknown as the NYTimes suggests.

[…] The idea behind the partnership was that America’s close cooperation with Ukraine would compensate for Russia’s vast advantages in manpower and weaponry. To guide the Ukrainians as they deployed their ever-more-sophisticated arsenal, the Americans created an operation called Task Force Dragon.

This was the problem with the supposed secrecy of the US and NATO involvement.  The weapons being used and the targeting parameters needed were beyond the technical capabilities of the Ukrainian military.  Does the NYTimes think that Russia did not know what was going on?

The secret center of the partnership was at the U.S. Army garrison in Wiesbaden, Germany. Each morning, U.S. and Ukrainian military officers set targeting priorities — Russian units, pieces of equipment or infrastructure. American and coalition intelligence officers searched satellite imagery, radio emissions and intercepted communications to find Russian positions. Task Force Dragon then gave the Ukrainians the coordinates so they could shoot at them.

[…] Easing a prohibition against American boots on Ukrainian ground, Wiesbaden was allowed to put about a dozen military advisers in Kyiv. To avoid drawing public attention to their presence, the Pentagon initially called them “subject matter experts.” Later the team was expanded, to about three dozen, and the military advisers were eventually allowed to travel to Ukrainian command posts closer to the fighting.

Does this sound like any war that America has engaged in in the past?  Vietnam comes to mind immediately. How many good, young Americans were lost in that hellhole?  How many “subject matter experts” have been lost in Ukraine?

[…] Ultimately, the U.S. military and C.I.A. were allowed to help with strikes into Russia. […] Longstanding policy barred the C.I.A. from providing intelligence on targets on Russian soil. But the C.I.A. could request “variances,” carve-outs to support strikes for specific objectives. 

The CIA has been operating in Ukraine for a long time.  The Maiden Coup in 2014 has the clear earmarks of a CIA operation.  The Ukrainian President, who was working towards better relations with Russia, was overthrown because of this fact.  The Minsk Agreement, which was supposed to end the violence in Ukraine, provided for the self-determination of the Russian majority eastern provinces.  That never happened.  What did happen was the systematic torture and killing of ethnic Russians by the Azov military unit, a neo-Nazi one.

According to many experts, the CIA has been organizing the majority of the war in Ukraine against Russia.  How did this take place?

According to how the CIA is supposed to work, the OBiden administration is supposed to have provided a “presidential finding memo” that would authorize the CIA’s activities in Ukraine.  Of course, there could very well be several such memoranda since the CIA’s involvement seems to have changed and gotten more hands on as time progressed.

One question that seems pertinent here is was the presidential finding signed by Biden or by autopen?  If autopen, that opens up another avenue of investigation about how the whole Ukrainian mess got started.

Such memoranda would be in the CIA’s authorization library.  No elite member of the chain of command would be without such an authorization.  If they have not already done so, perhaps, Gabbard, the DNI, and Ratcliffe, the CIA director, should pull those memos for PDJT’s review.  Let’s also be reminded that the Gang of Eight would have included Rubio at the time these findings were being signed.  So, Rubio should have been read in on these presidential findings.

Why now?  Why is the NYTimes publishing this now?  The NYTimes is pretending that this is something that the American public needs to know.  Of course, many people already knew this.  So why now?

Let’s be reminded that the NYTimes publishes these kinds of articles for political purposes.  The NYTimes has played this game for a long time.

One of the more prominent examples of this is the shooting down of TWA 800 off the south shore of Long Island on July 17, 1996.  258 credible witnesses had told the FBI of a likely missile strike.  However, there was an election to win for Bill Clinton.  So, that story was suppressed.  In its place eventually came the fiction that the center fuel tank had spontaneously exploded.  This was years later.  No 747 airliner was grounded as a result of this narrative.  Why not if that was really the cause?

What is the purpose here?

Is the publication of this info done to drive a wedge between Trump and Putin?  Is the NYTimes siding with those people who want the killing in Ukraine to continue because it benefits them financially?  Is the NYTimes article done to create a problem between Rubio and Trump?

It seems to me that this info being published for the whole world to see is a two-edged sword.  While it could place Trump in an awkward position with Putin, it could also be an opportunity to reset how things are going in Ukraine.  Zelenskyy is playing the EU off against America.  Perhaps a not-so-subtle hint about reducing the current participation of the US in this war could steer Zelenskyy’s responses.

The dance that has been playing out the last two months is futile. If America forces the EU to step into the vacuum militarily, they will fail. Negotiations don’t end wars, circumstances do, and the stand-off strategy being played out now is just killing more soldiers.

Let’s not forget that these articles are part of the Deep State’s attempts to neutralize Trump.  We are very close to seeing the true nature of just how corrupt these people are.  Every day that DOGE is operating, is another day closer to that outcome.

How many Americans are already dead in Ukraine?  When will this number be leaked to the NYTimes?  Whenever this is done, it will be done to blunt some incredibly corrupt finding that is about to be published from DOGE.