In a town full of snakes and other swamp creatures, Tulsi Gabbard stands tall as someone who speaks the truth. There are few secrets in Washington although the operation to take out the Fordow nuclear complex appears to be one such miracle. It is a certainty that many people in DC were aware of the work DNI Gabbard was doing with regard to the potentially treasonous activities of the Obama administration.
This certainly explains the glee that was exhibited by many including the media when it appeared that the President and Gabbard were at odds over the status of Iran’s nuclear program. In June PDJT said that Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear weapon. Gabbard had testified before Congress in March that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) was that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.
Those who wanted Gabbard out as DNI hoped this would drive a wedge between Trump and Gabbard. It did not. This remains true despite the media mischaracterizing Gabbard’s statements.
Trump knew as did Gabbard that 60% enriched uranium is created for only one purpose…to create a nuclear weapon. How close that effort was will always be a matter for debate. Is a few months from being able to do so very close?
In one man’s opinion, these efforts by outsiders had nothing to do with the status of Iran’s nuclear program. They had everything to do with slowing down and/or stopping Gabbard’s efforts regarding the potentially treasonous activities of the Obama administration. They did not succeed.
Wendi Mahoney over at American Thinker has produced a partial timeline of significant events. This is gleaned from the timeline released by Gabbard.
- 31 Aug 2016 — DHS tells then‑DNI Clapper there is “no indication” of a Russian plan to manipulate vote counts.
- 2 Sept 2016 — FBI asks that a forthcoming pre‑election assessment be “softened” because bureau analysts are “uncomfortable” implying Russia intends to disrupt the election.
- 12 Sept 2016 — I.C. publishes the cyber‑threat ICA concluding adversaries cannot covertly overturn the vote.
- 7 Oct 2016 — ODNI/DHS press release blames Russia for DNC hacks but omits that FBI and NSA had “low confidence” in that attribution.
- 7 Dec 2016 — Draft PDB reiterates that Russia did not tamper with election infrastructure; FBI abruptly withdraws, and a senior official quashes the product.
- 8 Dec 2016 — I.C. officials plan to publish the PDB the next day due to “high administration interest,” knowing Russian actors “did not impact recent U.S. election results.” Hours later, the FBI withdraws, announces it will draft a dissent, and a senior PDB editor cancels the brief “based on new guidance.”
- 9 Dec 2016 — Obama convenes National Security Council principals — including John Brennan, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, and Andrew McCabe — and orders a new ICA. That same day, two “blatantly false leaks” reach The Washington Post, alleging that Russia hacked the vote and that the CIA concluded that Moscow had intervened to elect Trump.
- 14 Dec 2016 through late Dec 2016 — Leaks continue claiming Vladimir Putin was “personally involved.” Obama continued to push the narrative that Russia could be involved. Asks Putin to “knock it off.” An ODNI whistle‑blower who challenges the narrative is sidelined and pressured to accept the finding that Russia preferred Trump, a position he writes he “could not concur with in good conscience.”
- 6 Jan 2017 — The unclassified ICA is released, asserting that Putin ordered an influence campaign to help Trump — contradicting months of I.C. reporting and relying in part on the Steele dossier.
Gabbard’s dump of a tranche of “Russiagate” documents show that the Lightbringer and other high-level officials of the Obama administration attempted to delegitimize PDJT’s victory in 2016 with false claims and a never-ending list of smears. Not only were they smearing PDJT, But they were working every angle to get PDJT removed from office.
Of course, there will always be some cognitively impaired Democrats who will believe that Putin won the 2016 election for Trump. Gabbard’s release obliterates that longstanding claim. It is the first time a senior Trump administration official has directly implicated former president Barack Obama as an active participant in the alleged conspiracy. Not only does former President Obama appear to be an active participant, Obama appears to be the leader of this conspiracy to overthrow the duly elected President of the United States.
How did Big Media respond to this release of evidence that could be labeled as treasonous? One media outlet ran a headline “It’s Time For Revenge.” Another talked about the “Feud Between Trump and Comey.” A third ran with “A Dangerous Lie.” Multiple outlets ran a headline that began, “With Trump Under Scrutiny Over Epstein.”
That headline leads us to the next ridiculous item on the agenda. Why did the allegedly defamatory article about PDJT in the Wall Street Journal drop now? It is clearly an attempt to distract the public from Gabbard’s findings. Big Media needed something to fill up their airspace other than Gabbard’s efforts. Trump has, of course, indicated that a suit for defamation is underway.
Gabbard’s documentary evidence confirms what’s long been obvious to anyone with a rational mind. The Lightbringer’s administration represents the most cancerous, corrupt, anti-democratic and brazenly lawless cabal in American history.
The Democrats had pushed the narrative that helped PDJT rise in the ranks of Republicans running in 2016. Why? Because they thought he would be the weakest candidate since he had never run a political campaign before and they would win in a landslide. When they lost an election they were certain their chosen candidate would win, the Obama administration instantly set about implementing the strategy the Soviet Union had tried in every American election since World War II: Cast doubt on the legitimacy of the American election to render the president unable to govern.
So, it wasn’t Russia that successfully cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2016 election; it was the Obama administration, either acting as an agent of Russia or acting independently, using Russia as its tool.
The definition of sedition comes to mind:
18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.