In the Illegitimacy Playbook, Part 4, there was significant discussion around “emergency scenarios” and how this might affect the transfer of power from the right to the left. It is clear listening to these people that they expect the left to win the midterms. Given that starting point, they then delve into what actions would happen and how they need to respond to what they expect would be violence and an unwillingness to allow leftists into the government.
One note of particular interest is the fact that the Democracy Renewal Group’s (DRG) ex-USAID democracy officers come from the CIA coup parts of USAID. The thought behind this seems to be that they are experienced in forming new governments.
🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 4: YES, MANY ARE AWARE OF THE GOALS 🚨 This one is a thread because there are multiple materials. On January 15, 2026, Renew American Democracy (RAD), the strategy built around the Democracy Renewal Group’s (DRG) ex-USAID democracy officers, held planning exercises for “emergency scenarios” and how it’d affect their “strategic objectives.” RAD’s explicit goal is in catalyzing those so-called “emergency scenarios” to manifest “structural reform” – the rewriting of American governance which the previous drops have covered. RAD/DRG hold the unique role within the wider blocking / protest alliance of defining what the new government looks like, presumably because they are made of ex-USAID officers who have specialized in installing new governments. As @MikeBenzCyber last night said on his stream, these DRG members come from the CIA coup parts of USAID. It’s been suggested that DRG is just a fringe group within the much larger blocking/protest ecosystem. This morning’s interim video mentioning Mike Smith disproved that. And PART 4 disproves that further – the wider network is well aware of DRG and that its goal is to secure a new government. They will dress it in the language that it’s Trump who will provoke it, and they’re only preventing a true Constitutional crisis. In reality, there’s a million ways to interpret what a “red line” is, and many ways to get Trump to cross it. Already, articles everywhere are telegraphing that Trump *will* cross it in the form of the Insurrection Act or martial law, softening us up for the coup ahead. The materials I’m showing you are from a RAD/DRG-ran planning exercise in January 2026. Groups represented by participants include: · National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) · Freedom Trainers / Beautiful Trouble · Team Democracy · Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy · Civil Service Strong · Project 2029 · Braver Angels · Indivisible · Better Together America · Center for Collaborative Democracy · Democracy Accelerator · Paths to Understanding · Co-Intelligence Institute · Cohesion Strategy · Community-Vision Solutions One of the working groups concerned “National Deliberations” – which lays the groundwork for structural reforms post-crisis. So every single participant in this forum was well aware the end point is rewriting our governance. Even more interesting, Tanya Alfredson of @BraverAngels participated in this particular working group – which should give pause to anyone who believes Braver Angels simply wants better dialogue. As you watch the videos, watch out for the code language they use to hint towards the ultimate end goal. As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) October 21, 2026
RAD/DRG’s framework comes from applying the USAID color revolution tactics here in America. In one such meeting in January this year, eleven working groups were given the following assignment.
“How would election meltdown and/or militarization scenario impact your ability to achieve your stated objective?”
Let’s be reminded that their stated objective is the radical transformation of America’s form of government.
As you work through this thread, it is clear that they are taking playbooks built to topple foreign governments and running them in America. They are setting the stage to “fundamentally transform America.” They show clear excitement at the idea of what Trump might do. I would venture a guess that Elissa Slotkin is already executing this playbook.
The idea that previous federal employees take info, data and strategies with them to overthrow the government of our country is traitor behavior at best. Didn’t these people take an oath when they were working in these jobs?
Some of these former USAID people are the same people who tried to lock out the Trump administration during the transition from Autopen to Trump.
The No Kings movement is part of this effort. These people were hoping to energize people against the current administration so that it would be easier to brainwash them later when the time for action occurred.
The No Kings Rally in October was a bit of a disappointment for these people. Actually to call it a flop would be understating the case. Despite the millions of dollars spent organizing, the number of people showing up are not growing and are, in fact, declining. Perhaps recruiting protestors from nursing homes was a bad idea.
One thing to watch in the coming days is the situation in California. The DOJ challenged sending out mail-in ballots to some 20,000 people that the federal government had identified as illegal aliens. This was in Los Angeles County. It is estimated that 190,000 illegal aliens will receive ballots in this state. California used the COVID scam to decide to mail ballots to everyone in the state. This is a clear invitation to fraud especially since California has no safeguards against illegal aliens voting.
If election results are contested because of this, these coup plotters will likely hijack the media to paint this as the federal government becoming illegitimate.
Here’s another example in California. Santa Ana Councilmember Thai Viet Phan admits that ONE THIRD OF THE ENTIRE CITY IS ILLEGAL. She says she wants the 1/3 of the city that’s undocumented immigrants to be able to vote and is proposing legislation to enable this.
Now for the real shocker. The voter participation rate in Santa Ana is over 85%. Just how much of those totals are illegal voters?
If the federal government were to challenge the results of federal elections in Santa Ana, is this one of those redlines that would trigger UDA and their fellow travelers to rise up and declare the federal government illegitimate? I am certain that no matter how egregious the results, California would certify these elections as fair and above board.
Illegals vote because NGOs and ambition politicians encourage them to vote. The only losers here are the American citizens whose votes are canceled out by this culture of illegality.
In The Democracy Files, Part 5, Danielle Reiff once again paints a picture of how the government will become illegitimate by lying about what has happened in the past. Reiif specifically states that, in the past, the current administration had intended to undermine democratic processes. She then goes on to discuss The Insurrection Act and willfully mis-states how the Act works. The failure to seat a member of Congress is another redline for her. She does not seem to entertain the idea that election fraud is a possibility.
THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 5: Washington state’s Secretary of State weighs in The below clip shows Danielle Reiff of DRG pitching her vision to an audience including Washington state’s Secretary of State, Steve Hobbs. She explains the red-line scenarios and ultimately a vision of creating a “cross-partisan” government in the wake of an illegitimate federal government. Her three “democratic emergency” scenarios should be familiar by now: · Election meltdown – which includes a widespread public loss of trust in election results · Insurrection Act deployed against protesters · An attempt to delay seating of legitimately elected officials post-election If the federal government becomes illegitimate in her view because of the above, then she proposes a cross-partisan system of transitional governance. She names a cross-partisan board of governors, as well President Obama and President Bush as potential transitional leaders. WA SoS Hobbs replies to Reiff that he has had the exact same conversation with German and Japanese officials regarding how to deal with AfD and right-wing nationalist parties. Now, to be fair, he does not want to commit because, in his words, “we’re winning.” But he doesn’t disagree either. Note also that here and in other recordings, “election meltdown” does not mean some sort of flashy media crisis. It means, simply, a large segment of the population doesn’t believe the election results are legitimate.
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) October 22, 2026
The invitation: Can you spot the code words in this?
This entire effort is based on speaking lies, posting innuendos and stoking division. They are trying to conjure up public consent based on the Joseph Goebbels’ method of repeating a lie over and over.
The rise of nationalism does not become a threat to our republican form of government. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a sovereign state being governed free from outside control. The problem in America is that there are trillions at stake and those whose money is at risk from a truly free country are the most anxious.
I wonder where the money is coming from to fund these people?
How do politicians fit into this?
Senator Merkley, the junior Senator from Oregon, recently filibustered in the Senate. Merkley pushed the idea that PDJT cannot federalize the National Guard without proving that a rebellion or invasion occurred. This is an outright lie. What Merkley left out was the provision about the inability to execute federal law with normal federal forces.
The timing of this speech is curious in and of itself. All of these people seem to be pushing for riots. It appears that they want another Summer of Love. This would create an atmosphere of fear. And fearful people are easier to manipulate.
Looks like Washington State’s governor is playing his part in stoking fear. Governor Ferguson has offered the services of that state’s National Guard to prevent “federal overreach” or “intimidation” at ballot drop boxes, etc. This is another not so subtle attempt to paint the current administration as some totalitarian one that will stop at nothing to remain in power.
I wonder if this might backfire and result in illegal aliens staying away from ballot drop boxes and polling places? Might the presence of troops (that is, the National Guard) inhibit those who might vote illegally?