One of the items that should always be part of any decision involving vaccines is a risk/benefit analysis. Will the benefit of being jabbed outweigh the risk involved in getting the jab? There is always some risk. No vaccination is perfectly safe.
In evaluating the risk, demographics need to be taken into consideration. In the past, because of some very serious adverse events that occurred, vaccinations for pregnant women were a no-no. The thalidomide disaster of birth defects is one example that prompted that kind of prohibition. Very few studies of new drugs will even attempt to study the effects on pregnant women. Yet, pregnant women are getting jabbed. Who thought this was a good idea?
Are there demographics that are experiencing more serious side effects from the vaccine? Do some segments of the population have greater numbers of serious problems after getting jabbed? What are the serious side effects?
One of the issues that has gained attention is the suffering of heart conditions by some segments of the population. The side effect of heart inflammation and chest pains is more prevalent in individuals under the age of 30. These conditions were sometimes seen in COVID patients as well.
One study of this issue has been done by the University of California. Earlier this year, a team led by spine and regenerative medicine doctor Tracy Høeg investigated the rate of heart inflammation and chest pain in children 12-17 following their second dose of the vaccination.
They found a clear difference among various age groups and genders. Teenage boys were the group at highest risk of serious heart problems.
The study authors observed that the 162 cases per million (CPM) risk of myocarditis in the 12-15 year-old range for boys “was the highest out of all the groups they looked at.” Boys aged 16 to 17 had the second highest risk of cardiac issues at 94 CPM. Teen girls had the lowest risk of heart muscle inflammation – with girls aged 16 to 17 having 13.4 CPM and those aged 12 to 14 having 13 CPM.
Boys 12 to 15 had a much smaller risk of serious illness from COVID. There were 26.7 CPM of COVID-19 hospitalization among the age bracket. A recent study into COVID hospitalization numbers showed that some 48% of all pediatric COVID patients in hospitals were discovered after the child had been admitted. From this data, it is likely that the CPM that actually required hospitalization due to COVID is in the 14 to 15 range.
In view of the near zero mortality risk combined with a risk of hospitalization that is only slightly higher, why should this demographic be vaccinated?
Even during high risk rates of COVID, such as in January this year, the threat posed by the vaccine is 4.3 times higher, while during low risk rates, the risk of teenage boys suffering a “cardiac adverse event” from the vaccine is a whopping 22.8 times higher. What are the benefits that outweigh the risks?
Dr. Fauci is pushing to extend vaccinations to younger patients. The mantra is that kids get vaccinated for lots of things. This is true. However, the things they get vaccinated for can have significant numbers of deleterious outcomes. A risk/benefit analysis should not ignore the large numbers of adverse events of vaccination just to fill the pockets of Big Pharma.
In a sane world, the data above should represent the nail in the coffin against teenagers and children being mandated to take the coronavirus vaccine. In today’s politicized environment, it obviously won’t be. COVID is a weapon to fundamentally transform America. The Left will not give up this weapon of fear.
In view of the facts stated above, what will happen if Dr. Fauci gets his way? How many kids will be permanently damaged by the vaccinations? Why is this necessary given the minuscule chance of serious illness from COVID for teenagers?