Myocarditis and pericarditis among those who have been “vaccinated” has been a recurring issue since the jabs started to be given. These two are not the only adverse reactions to the jab but these two are certainly among the more significant. A new study from Europe reveals that cases of heart inflammation that required hospitalization are much more common among individuals who have been jabbed with either the Pfizer or Moderna experimental mRNA drug therapy when compared to those who did not get jabbed.
This is a peer-reviewed study that has been published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). To quote from the conclusions:
Conclusions and Relevance – Results of this large cohort study indicated that both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. For individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose. These findings are compatible with between 4 and 7 excess events in 28 days per 100 000 vaccinees after BNT162b2, and between 9 and 28 excess events per 100 000 vaccinees after mRNA-1273.
Please note that the study limited the review to the 28-day period after administration of the first or second jab. The study broke down results into age cohorts by sex. Females 12-15 and males older than 40 who received just one dose did not appear to have an increased risk during the 28-day study period. The study did not look at the effects of boosters on the population studied. The study was massive including some 23+ million individuals. The increased risk was higher after the second dose in all age cohorts.
While all age cohorts except those noted above had an increased risk of heart inflammation, males aged 16-24 had an increased risk that was 5 to 15 times above those who did not get jabbed. Let that sink in. Regardless of how rare these conditions may be, increasing the risk by 5 to 15 times among 16-24 year-old males is unconscionable. This is especially true since the chances of COVID killing someone in this cohort are effectively zero.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a world-renowned cardiologist weighed in:
“In cardiology we spend our entire career trying to save every bit of heart muscle. We put in stents, we do heart catheterization, we do stress tests, we do CT angiograms. The whole game of cardiology is to preserve heart muscle. Under no circumstances would we accept a vaccine that causes even one person to stay sustain heart damage. Not one. And this idea that ‘oh, we’re going to ask a large number of people to sustain heart damage for some other theoretical benefit for a viral infection,’ which for most is less than a common cold, is untenable. The benefits of the vaccines in no way outweigh the risks.”
Some doctors will not clear a young athlete for sports participation without an echocardiogram if such athletes have been jabbed. The steep rise in heart attacks and death among world class athletes after getting the jab is the reason for this.
This study may also be pointing to one cause of the steep rise in excess mortality across the world where the mRNA therapies have been used. All age cohorts have seen an increase. Millennials ages 25-44 experienced the greatest increase hitting a peak of 84% above pre-pandemic levels.
The current public-private partnership model, where elected governments are partnering with enormous, unelected, money driven, and unchecked private interests and self-serving foundations, lead to “regulatory capture.” Government officials wind up working on behalf of, and advancing, private interests. No better example in the US is the CDC. The CDC is nothing but an ad agency for Pfizer and Moderna.
It is long past time for independent investigations into this scam that was foisted on the public. What are the conflicts of interest that were never revealed? Who failed to perform their legally required due diligence? Why was knowledge about effective treatments suppressed? How many millions of people have died because some people wanted to make money off the jabs?