Why are we not allowed to question the government’s and Big Pharma’s narrative on COVID and the deadly mRNA jabs? Why is it socially taboo to even bring up questions about the mRNA therapies even as more and more obvious issues surface?
Neil Oliver touches on this subject:
As usual, Oliver goes where most “journalists” and other Big Media personalities dare not to tread. In particular, he asks about the fact that deaths are now higher than they were at any time during the COVID “pandemic.” Why is no one willing to delve into the source of this excess mortality that is plaguing all countries that have had significant levels of jabbing from the mRNA therapies?
Oliver asks, “Why are we still seeing “safe” in ads for the boosters when people, many of them, are dropping like flies?”
Let’s remember that the standard approach by our corrupt leaders is to promote a false narrative (think Russia collusion hoax), get the bobbleheads in Big Media to tout the story, suppress any news that surfaces against the narrative and denounce any and all opposition as “fringe” and “extreme” in their thinking.
Did that happen with COVID and the mRNA therapies? Absolutely. Highly credentialed, well-respected individuals in the medical and scientific fields were smeared, denigrated and cancelled. Why? To diminish the reach of their message that all was not right in Big Pharma’s approach to the “pandemic.”
Have they been successful? Sure, they have. Look at how many people voluntarily got the jab. I am not talking about people who were coerced under the threat of losing their jobs and livelihoods. I am referring to the significant number of people who failed to even question the “safe and effective” narrative.
Is the tide turning? It would appear so. Investigations are starting to be undertaken. But, these must be real investigations not like the investigation of the Hunter Biden laptop. We The People need to keep the pressure on our reps to see to it that people like Dr. Fauci are held accountable.
Accountability is a must. The truth must come out. There must be a reckoning.
One professor, Emily Oster, has called for a “Pandemic Amnesty”.
“We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty….we need to learn from our mistakes and then let them go. We need to forgive the attacks, too. Because I thought schools should reopen and argued that kids as a group were not at high risk, I was called a “teacher killer” and a “génocidaire.” It wasn’t pleasant, but feelings were high. And I certainly don’t need to dissect and rehash that time for the rest of my days.”
That’s just BS. Here are things that we should never forget.
The WHO and CDC had publicly available pandemic plans in place based on a century’s worth of experience. What was not in those plans? Widespread lockdowns and masking. You know what else was missing from the approach they followed? Risk benefit analyses and what the ethical issues were. Also what non-drug approaches might be beneficial.
Next, the establishment not only shut down all debate about repurposed drugs (HCQ, Ivermectin), they also moved aggressively to even restrict access to such treatments under the supervision of your own doctor. This is contrary to the very practice of medicine.
This suppression of effective treatments may be the greatest crime of the last 75 years. How many lives could have been saved through early treatment? When in the history of medicine was the only treatment available defined as going home and waiting to be sick enough for admission to a hospital? I won’t even touch on the disaster that was putting people on ventilators and/or prescribing Remdesivir.
Mandating somebody to get vaccinated with an experimental mRNA vaccine for a respiratory virus that, depending on age/health, poses fairly little risk is unethical. However, this was all in the plan to see how much control the government could exercise over the public. Since the vaccines don’t offer sterilizing immunity, there is no and never was any community benefit from the vaccine.
The risk reward proposition for these vaccines does not lead to the conclusion that children should be vaccinated. Even the notion that they’re saving grandma is garbage because the vaccines don’t prevent the transmission of the virus. This is probably the most evil thing to come out of this governing by our elites and we must never forget this.
School lockdowns may have the biggest impact in the long run. According to the WSJ:
“It’s hard to understate the human damage that these dry statistics represent. The learning loss is considerable and will take years to make up, if it ever is. Children who fall behind in reading skills have difficulty learning other subjects. The numbers also mean that millions of young Americans don’t know even the basics of writing and arithmetic.”
AJ Kay provides some sort of plan about how we return to normalcy.
Acknowledgment – We won’t get anywhere until the people who affected these catastrophic errors acknowledge their harm. This isn’t about “being right” – it’s a matter of human decency. Admitting a mistake – especially one that hurt people – goes a long way toward healing. The longer people refuse to admit their errors, the more the harm will continue to compound.
Accounting – We need to know what decisions were made and by whom. I cannot emphasize enough how crucial this is to moving forward. We cannot solve problems if we don’t know who or what caused them. And it should be understood that anyone who resists this process does not have problem-solving as their primary motivation.
Accountability – The people who made those decisions need to be held accountable. Leadership is not just about the right to make decisions – it’s about taking responsibility for those decisions. If an elderly person died alone at your direction, you are disqualified. If children were denied schooling, safeguards, and social interactions under your watch, you’ve already had your interview and failed. People who were hurt don’t want those who caused the disaster in charge of the recovery efforts. The judgment of these ‘leaders’ has been tested and found lacking.
New Leadership/Representatives – The people who orchestrated and carried out these policies should step down/be removed and replaced, ideally with people who, throughout the hysteria, kept a cool head and proposed viable solutions. Without new leadership, we can expect the same results next time.
Safeguards – We need policies that check the powers that allowed this to happen. Endless emergency declarations and science funding mechanisms that hold researchers’ careers hostage to a prescribed narrative, for example, both need to be eliminated.
Commitment – The clean-up required here is immense and may take generations of repair. We must commit to checking out every second and third-order effect and correcting it to stay on course.”
If we fail to hold those accountable who should be held accountable, it will happen again. Let the 20 rebels in the House of Representatives lead the way.