One of the features on TV this fall has the been the nonstop airing of ads pushing the mRNA COVID jabs as something that is vital and necessary for a healthy population. Both the government and Big Pharma have been out there trying to coerce the public into taking another shot at the death-and-disability lottery. Health bureaucrats and Pfizer and Moderna hoped that positioning Covid jabs as once-a-year injections alongside flu shots would increase demand.
Why did they go this route of tying the COVID jab to the flu shot? Last year the mRNA COVID campaign failed miserably. Only 17 % of the American public actually got jabbed with a booster “bivalent” jab last year. Millions upon millions of doses did not get used.
So, the bright people at the CDC and Big Pharma decided to position the mRNA alongside the flu shot and thought this would increase demand. They were wrong. In fact, there is growing evidence to suggest that the flu shot uptake is trailing traditional levels as well.
Alex Berenson has provided some numbers and grafts.
Weekly data from three large blue states – Colorado, Washington, and Massachusetts – shows that jab demand trails even the dismal launch of the “bivalent” mRNA vaccines last fall, which resulted in just 17 percent of Americans receiving jabs.
Colorado gave out 540,000 Covid jabs in September and October. That figure may sound like a lot, but it is under 10 percent of the state population – and it lags the figure over the same period in 2022 by about one-quarter.
Similarly, Washington state administered 840,000 jabs through early November, or 11 percent of its population – a decline of about 30 percent compared to 2022.
And Massachusetts, which is extraordinarily liberal and had near-complete adult vaccination in 2021, is at 12 percent – compared to about 27 percent for flu shots.
Further, the states all appear to have exhausted demand. Even though the jabs were rolled out slightly later in 2023 than 2022, administrations peaked at lower levels in October and are now declining faster.
Keep in mind that this lack of demand comes despite massive ad campaigns. Someone characterized Moderna’s campaign as weird. That’s not my take on it. The first time I saw their ad I thought it was idiotic.
The Moderna campaign features the slogan “Spikevax that body.” Yes, Spikevax is the official name for Moderna’s mRNA-1273 COVID jab. So, the feature of the jab that many researchers associate with the many deleterious side effects including death is part of the official tradename for the product.
Just what level of idiot is running this ad campaign for Moderna?
It appears at this point that overall coverage will be in the 10% to 13% range for this campaign. It is possible that coverage may not break into double digits. Why is coverage so weak?
Big Media is blaming…wait for it…overwhelming demand and the inability to obtain the jab. The NYTimes blamed “distribution issues” and “snags with the new billing codes.” They added that jabs “have been slow to reach doctors’ offices.”
The reality is that many buying services are reporting that way too much “vaccine” has been ordered and that much of it will expire in May 2024 without being used.
Clearly, despite the best efforts of Big Media and our government trying suppress the problems with the mRNA jab, the public has awakened to the dangers of the death-and-disability jab. The CDC and the FDA need to withdraw their authorization for this product.
If one feels the need for a shot, my recommendation would be a shot of whiskey. The side effects will be very mild and almost always will be safer than the mRNA jab.