Is the narco-boats campaign part of a larger strategy? At the recent cabinet meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio talked about how everything PDJT does is wrapped around what is best for America. Rubio noted that this is the first time in the last four decades that America has had a President that acted this way.
Obviously, the elimination of narcotics runs across the Caribbean and in the Pacific is in the best interests of America. For those who would want to argue about its legality, I would ask this question. When someone is coming to kill you, when do you stop defending yourself? The simple answer is when the threat is eliminated. That is what is happening in international waters.
This effort against the narco-terrorists certainly is part of the MAGA theme. However, is this effort part of an ongoing strategy to expose traitorous Deep State actors as well?
PDJT seems to have an unusual ability to get Democrats to defend the indefensible. Take the “Maryland Man.” Kilmar Garcia is an illegal alien. He is an alleged wife-beater with several restraining orders against him. Garcia is suspected of human trafficking. Yet the Democrats were all up arms and raising a ruckus over his deportation. One US Senator actually travelled to El Salvador to have margaritas with him.
There has been a long series of activities like this by the Democrats. Every time they think they have an issue to smear PDJT and/or those who work for him in this administration, it has backfired hugely. And now it seems that Big Media is less able to bail out the Dems.
The Narco-boats mission began kinetic operations in September. Since then, the Seditious Six have come out advocating for disobedience within the ranks of our military. One, Senator Mark Kelly, is a retired officer who is still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Perhaps his day in court is coming.
More recently Senator Mark Warner has advocated for the military to execute a coup against PDJT. As with all things espoused by the professional, the language is worded for plausible deniability. However the expressed intent is clear for those who are non-pretending. What else is meant by:
…”I think in many ways the uniformed military may help save us from this president and his lame people like Hegseth. Because I think that their commitment is to the constitution and obviously not to Trump.”
Let’s take a step into Whatabout for a moment. What would have been the response from media if Senator Jeff Sessions said it was his hope the U.S. military would reject instructions from President Obama and instead follow the guidelines of his political opposition? I think we all know the answer to that question.
Perhaps Senator Mark Warner needs to have to answer a few follow-up questions that our lapdog media refuse to ask.
“Senator Warner, are you asking for a military led overthrow of the United States government?” If no, then how is your expressed preference any different? Please explain the distinction.
Some commentators and legal observers argue that Warner’s statements could be interpreted as violating 18 U.S. Code § 2387, which criminalizes attempts to influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of U.S. military personnel.
Specifically, the statute prohibits advising, counseling, or urging insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty among military members, with penalties including fines, up to ten years in prison, and ineligibility for federal employment for five years following conviction.
I am not holding my breath that there will be an indictment.
That being said, I cannot help but think that the narco-boats operation is the result of growing uncovering of various Deep State operations. DOGE started the process and it seems that much has been built on those findings.
Is Team Trump attacking the Deep State the same way a terrorist network is taken down, by first conducting numerous raids to establish its perimeter? Then one proceeds to drive towards the center, with each step exploiting intelligence from previous moves.
Getting people like the Seditious Six and Senator Mark Warner to come out with the BS that they have come out with demonstrates a fear that might be causing panic among the most hardened of Deep Staters.
The fact that Warner has had to artificially inject momentum, via sensationalism, and a message directed towards Trump’s opponent’s, shows the story is dying. Warner’s intervention, whilst designed to placate the anti-Trump crowd by artificially boosting the story in their feeds, is also a sign of Deep State desperation because it skirts far closer to a call for mutiny than the original Seditious Six approach.
Is the administration getting close to exposing various money trails that connect to Ukrainian “aid?” Senator Kelly’s twin brother appears to be connected to the Zelenskyy aide who resigned in the middle of the Ukrainian corruption scandal last week.
Just how long will this process of uncovering the traitors among us take?