Category Archives: Supreme Court

Is The Dam Breaking?

      Comments Off on Is The Dam Breaking?

Dr. Tom Woods has published a piece about racial quotas in medical schools.  Actions like that of Dr. Wang indicate that the pendulum is swinging back.

Yes, I know we’re a “litigious society,” as they say, but it still makes me happy when a good guy sues bad guys who never expected to have to pay for their wrongdoing.

The good guy in question is Dr. Norman Wang, who until 2020 had been a mild-mannered academic who had attracted no controversy of any kind. A cardiologist, Dr. Wang was a professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and director of the fellowship program in clinical cardiac electrophysiology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. ... 

Continue reading...

A Supreme Court Coup?

      Comments Off on A Supreme Court Coup?

One of the items that sticks in the craw of Communists Democrats is the fact that there are now 6 justices that actually issue opinions based on the Constitution when deciding a case.  For decades the Court had been dominated by justices who believed that it was their duty to define the law in terms of their own political philosophy.  That ended when Trump nominated and the Republican Senate confirmed three justices that pay attention to the Constitution.

Continue reading...

Odds and Ends

      Comments Off on Odds and Ends

Planned Parenthood (what a misnomer that is) wants to expand the Supreme Court in the wake of Roe vs Wade being overturned.  According to Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, changes are needed because of the recent attacks “on our democratic rights and our democratic freedoms.”

I wonder what freedoms are being attacked?   It couldn’t be the “right” to murder an unborn child, could it?  Could it be the “right” to let a baby die that survives an abortion? ... 

Continue reading...

Democrats Threaten Supreme Court

      Comments Off on Democrats Threaten Supreme Court

Republicans are accusing the Department of Justice of “actively” seeking to “dissuade” the U.S. Marshals Service from enforcing 18 USC 1507 to protect the Supreme Court justices.  In addition, Democratic senators are attempting to leverage the Supreme Court budget in exchange for an enforceable ethics code.

During a Senate Judiciary hearing on Supreme Court ethics reform, Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., tore into their Democratic colleagues for “threatening to cut off the funding for the security at the Supreme Court,” as Cruz said. ... 

Continue reading...

Suspension of Constitutional Order

      Comments Off on Suspension of Constitutional Order

Many Americans believe that the January 6th events were staged.  Much has been made of the fact that certain individuals were seen agitating and riling people up, entering the Capitol with them and then selectively being ignored in the mass arrests that were made.  Nancy Pelosi had a camera crew in the Capitol to record events.  The J6 Unselect Committee was designed to keep the public’s attention away from the election fraud that occurred.

Few people had really reviewed what happened inside Congress on that day.  Regitiger has published a piece that is worthy of review and thought.  Please bear with the misspellings and punctuation errors.  This piece deserves careful consideration.

Continue reading...

Questions

      Comments Off on Questions

Victor Davis Hanson has questions for the country.  Every American, Democrat, Republican or independent should want answers to these questions.  Perhaps Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Hakeem Jeffries, Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell would deign to answer them since all of this has taken place on their watch.  If they won’t answer them, they should be removed from Congress along with any and all other leadership in Congress who facilitated this coup.

Continue reading...

Segregation Money   

      Comments Off on Segregation Money   

Harvard is engaged in defending a suit that alleges discrimination in admissions due to its race-conscious approach.  Due to a missed deadline for filing a notice of claim with their insurance carrier, the amount of money that Harvard is spending to protect their “right” to discriminate based on race is now visible for the world to see.

Continue reading...

The Dobbs Triumph

      Comments Off on The Dobbs Triumph

Back after the leak of the Dobbs decision that presaged the overturning of the Row v Wade decision, John Davidson wrote an article for the Federalist that praised the decision.  The Dobbs decision returned some semblance of sanity to cases being argued in the Supreme Court.  The decision was a triumph for how our founding fathers saw the branches of government.  Davidson also warned about the potential violent after effects of the decision.

Continue reading...