It is was never a question of if. It has always been just a question of when. It has been clear for a long time that those who refused to get jabbed would be relegated to a status of being a second-class citizen at best. The University of Colorado Hospital has now confirmed this by refusing medical care to a woman who has renal failure. Their reason is that the woman is unvaccinated. This is another example of the “Biden Effect.”
Outraged state GOP Rep. Tim Geitner shared on Facebook Live that a woman he knows was denied kidney transplant surgery at University of Colorado Hospital because she is not vaccinated against COVID-19.
UCHealth denies life saving treatment – kidney transplant – to El Paso County resident. See my FB live post @timgeitnercolorado pic.twitter.com/Z2r8D2VY4m
— Tim Geitner (@tgeitner) October 5, 2021
Geitner said it was “incredibly frustrating, incredibly sad, incredibly disgusting.” This decision was made by the hospital despite the fact that the woman seeking the transplant has a donor lined up.
UCHealth wouldn’t comment on any specific patient’s situation, but it did confirm that vaccination is a requirement for organ transplant patients “in almost all situations.”
Hospital spokesman Dan Weaver tried to deflect attention away from the decision by saying that it’s common for transplant patients to be asked to meet a variety of conditions before, during and after surgery — and that predates the pandemic.
Yes, he actually said that in response to questions about this specific situation. Weaver tries to justify denying medical care because there have always been conditions for transplant surgery. It is understood that there are pre-conditions. To imply that such a condition (COVID vaccination) predates the pandemic would be laughable if it was not so horrific.
Weaver gave examples of vaccination requirements that included hepatitis, MMR and others. Weaver noted:
“These requirements increase the likelihood that a transplant will be successful and the patient will avoid rejection.”
The problem with this statement is that the vaccinations quoted actually stop the infections they target. The so-called vaccines for COVID do not stop infection. This is a scientific fact that is well known by all experts in the field.
In another futile attempt to justify the hospital’s decision, Weaver went on to state that unvaccinated patients have a much higher COVID mortality rate. He claimed that the rate was between 20% and 30%. This is total BS. There is no demographic in the population that has such a rate. All data regarding mortality show low mortality rates with the highest rates reserved for the very old (<85).
Regarding the donor who is also unvaccinated, Weaver said:
“A living donor could pass COVID-19 infection on to an organ recipient even if they initially test negative for the disease, putting the patient’s life at risk.”
Weaver is implying that such a possibility would not exist if the donor was vaccinated. Again, this is total BS. A Pfizer study that was presented on September 17th to the FDA vaccine advisory board noted that infection with COVID was MORE LIKELY after vaccination. In fact, vaccinated people were more than 3 times more likely to catch COVID than unvaccinated ones.
Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee noted:
“If you get the Pfizer vax, you’re more likely to get COVID. So, when they weren’t injected, their infection rate was 1.3% and when they got injected, it was 4.34%. It went up by over 300%.”
All of this ignores the fact that Ivermectin taken as a prophylactic actually does stop infection. Wouldn’t this be a better course of treatment for transplant patients?
As noted above, these edicts are not about the potential health and safety of the patients. In this case there are two, the donor and the recipient. It is about control. The American public is not allowed to question the decisions of the fraudulent administration in Washington no matter how stupid or insane such decisions are. Dissent will be crushed one way or another. How many good people will die because of such insanity?