Impeachment Is A Cult
HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes appears for an interview with Mike Huckabee on Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) to discuss the impeachment dynamic. Huckabee’s questions were intelligent, well thought out and comprehensive.
HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes appears for an interview with Mike Huckabee on Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) to discuss the impeachment dynamic. Huckabee’s questions were intelligent, well thought out and comprehensive.
Sometime this week ringmaster Adam Schiff will entertain the country with the beginnings of the public phase of his star-chamber proceeding. Adam Schiff, as he has proven over and over again, is no seeker after the truth. For two years during the Mueller investigation he regaled the American public with lies about what he had seen in classified documents. These lies painted a picture of such corruption by PDJT that PDJT would likely be marched out of the White House in handcuffs when the Mueller Report was released. Of course, when the report was released, Schiff was convicted in the court of public opinion as a Congressman with exactly zero credibility.
This upcoming public circus is the result of actions that the Democrats took recently in the House. House Democrats passed a resolution that defined the procedures for their inquiry moving forward. Keep in mind the inquiry has never been officially authorized by a full House vote. The procedures do not permit any witnesses to be called unless they are approved by Josef Stalin wannabe Adam Schiff. So the idea of something fair and transparent is about as likely as hell freezing over.
Clarence Thomas called it “a high tech lynching” when the Democrats accused Thomas of being a sex maniac during his confirmation hearings. The Democrats were trying to create a “lynching” atmosphere so that they could defeat his nomination. The facts be damned. A good man was smeared because the Democrats did not like the fact that he was a constitutionalist. The Dems knew that it would be difficult to persuade Thomas to abandon his legal principles and vote to transform the country into something other than a constitutional republic. Therefore his nomination had to be derailed. The Dems did not succeed because a good man stood up and called them out on what they were trying to do.
They tried the same thing with Justice Kavanaugh. Instead of Anita Hill, they substituted Christine Blasey Ford. Her story was as fake as it gets. The storyline was deliberately obtuse so that few details could be checked. Why? If real details were there, the whole narrative would have quickly collapsed like the house of cards that it was. It did eventually collapse anyway but not before the Dems had once again smeared a good man.
There is no question but that the Dems are trying this again. This time it is the President that they are trying to lynch. Nineteen minutes after PDJT took the oath of office, the Washington Post was front and center reporting that the impeachment case against PDJTwas underway.
An interesting bit of news hit the wire on Wednesday. Via DOJ, one Imaad Zuberi, a 49-year-old resident of Arcadia, California, agreed to plead guilty to a variety of illegal activities surrounding campaign contributions, political influence, and unregistered lobbying on behalf of foreign clients.
Zuberi has agreed to plead guilty to those charges at a later date, pursuant to a plea agreement. This kind of language in a charging situation normally indicates that the felon has agreed to help out with other cases. His sentencing recommendation will depend on how truthful and helpful he is to prosecutors at the DOJ.
Just who was he raising money for? And how much?
U.S. Ambassador Gordon Sondland was directed by the State Department not to appear Tuesday for an interview with House committees leading the fraudulent impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. The non-appearance follows Chairman Adam Schiff’s manipulative media releases based on Ambassador Kurt Volker testimony.
This video exposes both the corrupt attempts by the Democrats to undo the results of the 2016 election as well as these House members calling out members of the press for their lack of due diligence. It is worth 13 minutes of your time.
On Monday, Rep. Adam Schiff, the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and Rep. Eliot L. Engel, the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, sent a letter to Department of Defense (DOD) Secretary Mark Esper and a letter to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acting Director Russell Vought conveying “subpoenas” for key documents as part of the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.
It was widely known that in order to submit an ICIG whistleblower report that the information had to be firsthand knowledge. No hearsay or gossip was permitted. It was stated unequivocally that submitting second-hand knowledge would result in the complaint being rejected.
As Sean Davis at The Federalist noted,
“The [Intelligence Community Inspector General] cannot transmit information via the ICPWA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing,” the previous form stated under the bolded heading “FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED.” “This includes information received from another person, such as when an employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing.”
“If you think that wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, [the Intelligence Community Inspector General] will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA,” the form concluded.
Every major Democrat candidate for President has made the pilgrimage to the throne of Rev. Al Sharpton. The fact that Sharpton has been a divisive force within the country for decades is largely irrelevant. If a Democrat wants the black vote, they bow and scrape and kiss Al’s ring because he’s the Pope of race hustling. Nationally, as well as in many states, Democrats can’t win without a 90% black vote. Al Sharpton delivers the ghetto vote that the Democrats need desperately.
Sharpton stirred up the Crown Heights riot and got people killed when they burned that store down with people in it. Sharpton was a principal figure in the Tawanna Brawley hoax which falsely smeared the NYPD and led to civil unrest. Sharpton was one of the principal reasons that George Zimmerman was charged when he shot and killed Trayvon Martin in a clear case of self-defense. There are a boatload of other examples over the years. Sharpton has made his living off of race hustling.
On Thursday Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) “played back” some of the Rev’s statements over the years during a hearing on policing. Gaetz used quotes from noted liberal Joe Scarborough as part of his exposition. Gaetz exposed Sharpton’s history of bigotry and anti-semitism. And the best part is that it is now part of the Congressional Record.
Two special elections for the House of Representatives were held on Tuesday in North Carolina. These were for NC3 and NC9. The Republican who had represented NC3 died after winning re-election in 2018. In NC9 Mark Harris, the incumbent Republican, edged Dan McCready, a smooth talking and personable Democrat by a few hundred votes in 2018. However, the NC Board of Elections refused to certify the win.
The reason? Apparently a political consultant for the Harris campaign allegedly mishandled some absentee ballots. The Board of Elections felt the case was strong enough to call for another election. This mishandling of absentee ballots is currently being litigated in the courts in NC.
It sounds an awful lot like the “harvesting” of ballots that took place in California during the 2018 elections. In some counties in California, more than 250,000 absentee ballots were “harvested.” The result was the flipping of a considerable number of House districts from Republican to Democratic hands. No charges have been filed in California.
This article from The Last Refuge exposes the foundational aspects of the corrupt nature of the US Senate.
John Ratcliffe Discusses DOJ/FBI Expectations and SSCI Involvement in Blocking His DNI Nomination…
Posted on September 8, 2019by sundance
Representative John Ratcliffe was/is a key member of the House who has investigated the details of the DOJ and FBI intelligence abuse during the 2016 election. Factually, Ratcliffe is one of only a few high-clearance House members who had seen all of the unredacted and classified documents associated with the DOJ and FBI activity. ...