Recently I posted an article about pretending. The reason that the evil people have gotten away with so much is that people pretend that such evil does not exist. It is the only honest evaluation of today’s state of affairs that explains how so many people do not see the evil that surrounds us.
I came across an article published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). It is called “Communication of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media by Physicians in the US.”
This article is another example of great pretending. It is also very dangerous since it awards the CDC with Ministry of Truth status. The study states that legal remedies are needed for physicians who engage in the dissemination of “misinformation” as defined by the study’s authors. In other words, censorship must be the order of the day for such people by whatever means necessary.
The first aspect of pretending that is encountered occurs in the definition of misinformation for purposes of the study. Misinformation was defined as “assertions unsupported by or contradicting US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance on COVID-19 prevention and treatment during the period assessed or contradicting the existing state of scientific evidence for any topics not covered by the CDC .”
This pretends that only the CDC has the correct information about how to treat a new illness. It ignores the doctors out in the field who are treating patients every day and who, through their training and experience, see possible avenues of treatment.
Early in 2020 multiple doctors uncovered treatment protocols that appeared to be effective. How effective is always a matter of debate. Dr. Zelenko from New York was one of the first doctors to go public in a big way with a treatment that he developed. It was hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) along with azithromycin and zinc supplements.
Was this protocol that included HCQ effective? Absolutely if given during the early stages of the illness. This is what frontline doctors were seeing. Dr. Zelenko treated more than a thousand, older patients and only lost four of them. Other doctors reported similar results from carefully documented reports of their treatments.
The study claims that randomized clinical trials proved that HCQ was not effective. What the study does not tell you is that, in the referenced clinical trials, HCQ was given to hospitalized patients. As reported by physicians, all effective uses of the drug were said to occur during the early stages of the illness. Hospitalized patients do not fall into this category. Why were clinical trials approved for hospitalized patients only? Did the elite public health agencies not want to find an effective treatment?
Another treatment that proved highly effective was the use of ivermectin in a protocol along with z-paks and a zinc supplement in Uttar Pradesh in India. Essentially COVID was stopped cold there by this treatment regimen.
Uttar Pradesh is a state within India. It has the largest population of any state in India with an estimated population of 241 million people. That is more than most countries on the planet. It is a densely populated area. COVID was raging there. Then, all of a sudden, it was over.
How did officials in Uttar Pradesh accomplish this? Was it accomplished by getting everyone vaccinated? It turns out that the vaccination rate in the state was 5.8%. Yes, that’s right. Just one in twenty had been vaccinated. Was it accomplished by sealing COVID patients in their homes by welding their doors shut as was done in some areas in China? No. Since this might legitimately be called a miracle based on the rest of the world, did God intervene? Not directly that anyone can discern.
Their approach is similar to what any good, frontline doctor will do when confronted with a “novel” illness. That approach involves uses previous experience and knowledge to try to find an approach that may prove to be helpful and beneficial.
In this case, a medical team in Agra was the flash point for the successful treatment. Agra is a city on the banks of the Yamuna river in Uttar Pradesh. It has a population of about 1.6 million.
In May-June 2020, that team, led by Dr. Anshul Pareek, administered ivermectin (IVM) to all RRT team members in the district on an experimental basis. A district is a subset of the Uttar Pradesh similar to our counties in America. Over time, it was observed that none of the team developed COVID-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus.
Based on these observations, the state government eventually sanctioned the use of IVM as a prophylactic for all the contacts of COVID patients. Later the administration of therapeutic doses for COVID patients was added to the state’s protocols.
These treatments and others that proved effective are considered misinformation for purposes of this study. Why? Because they did not promote the products that the CDC was pushing. Let’s remember that emergency authorization of the mRNA jabs could not have happened legally if effective treatments existed.
We all know who the real purveyors of misinformation are — it’s the very people who purport to police misinformation. The misinformation problem from official sources is the real issue.
“By publishing this paper,” writes Stanford’s Jay Bhattacharya, “the American medical establishment continues to trash its already damaged reputation.”
Bhattacharya singles out as particularly absurd that the paper would consider it “misinformation” to note that the Covid jabs don’t prevent transmission. Even the CDC eventually conceded this to be true. Yet the study considered such statements to be misinformation.
As Dr. Tracy Hoeg puts it, “It takes narratives and proclaims them to be true, then seeks to punish the skeptics and heretics, even when the heretics are demonstrably correct.”
Another avenue of attack in the study against doctors performing their sworn duties was to say that the treatments had not been tested. In other words, such treatments did not have the gold seal of approval from the elite public health agencies in the US government.
With a new illness what treatment would have such seal of approval? Is it not the job of a physician to find the best treatment for his/her patients? This study is implying that doctors should not be doing this. In fact, it also is saying that such doctors should face legal sanctions for doing this. I guess the authors of this study are saying that doctors should merely be pill pushers for Big Pharma.
This study sets a new low for JAMA. Imagine being so ignorant as to publish a paper about misinformation and label people who question the effectiveness of community cloth masking as purveyors of misinformation when anyone who can read knows this.
The medical establishment already punishes people who dissent from the consensus — even when the entire world can see the consensus is (at best) flawed.
Publishing such this study partners JAMA with the setting up of a Ministry of Truth for the medical establishment. Recommending that doctors be sanctioned for doing their job shows just how far JAMA has fallen.
How many more people will die who shouldn’t die because JAMA has published a study like this?