Comer’s List
James Comer is the Republican chair who has investigating the Biden Crime Family. Comer has produced a short summary of the key items uncovered in their ongoing investigation.
James Comer is the Republican chair who has investigating the Biden Crime Family. Comer has produced a short summary of the key items uncovered in their ongoing investigation.
The last federal budget that went through the appropriations process, passed both chambers and signed by a president, was the fiscal year 2008 budget signed in September 2007 by George W Bush. Every single budget from that moment to today has been a series of continuing resolutions, omnibus spending packages (mini and regular) and baseline budgeted CR extensions. This is the insanity that has resulted in the debt mess we see today.
As most of America knows, the corrupt prosecution of PDJT knows no bounds. The UniParty will do anything to prevent PDJT from getting another term in office at the White House. By any means necessary is their motto.
One aspect of this ongoing effort is to silence PDJT during the presidential campaign. Almost two weeks ago Jack Smith’s prosecution asked a judge to silence PDJT during the campaign. Ostensibly this was to protect the right to a fair and impartial administration of justice. The fact that this would interfere in the election was ignored. The public be damned is clearly at the forefront of their efforts.
I have a friend who has been extolling the virtues of Matt Gaetz, a House congressman from Florida. On Sunday, I had a chance to witness Matt in action as he battled Maria Bartiromo over the spending crisis in Washington. Before I delve into that let’s be reminded that, as the government funding crisis comes to a head, the media will paint any Republican who is opposed to unlimited spending as an extremist who is trying to destroy the country. Such a person will be depicted as attempting to undermine the foundations of democracy and would be literally trying to kill people by standing up for a budget.
The silent majority are beginning to rise up. The silent majority is becoming less silent. They have been spectators so far to the battle that is going on. Some engage in the fight from the periphery, but are still spectators. They are not the target…yet. But they will be once the obstacle that is in their way…President Donald J Trump…is removed. But even if they succeed in dimming his message, others will step up.
It seems like only yesterday that we were talking about the government taking over other sections of the economy now that the New Mexico governor went full Hitler last Friday. One area that was mentioned was food. Now the mayor of Chicago wants to open city-owned grocery stores. What could possibly go wrong?
Winning
A federal appeals court allowed three doctors to sue the FDA over a series of website and social media posts condemning ivermectin as a treatment for COVID. The doctors took the approach that the FDA exceeded its authority by offering medical advice. In addition, the FDA’s messaging interfered with their own individual medical practices.
Recently I had the opportunity to listen to an interview that was done a year ago with the ultra-leftist Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. This interview is remarkable. Buttigieg is interviewed on the smorgasbord of policies that the people behind the curtain propose to solve the inflation problem. In this eight-minute segment Buttigieg reveals that the administration plans are to take over much of the economy.
As most of the country knows, New Mexico Governor Lujan Grisham went full Hitler last Friday when she announced a ban carrying guns for 30 days as a “public health emergency.” This approach was entirely predictable. It is the result of Americans allowing various governors to take totalitarian control over citizens during COVID-19 by declaring the same “public health emergencies.” It was just a question of which Communist Democrat governor would actually do it.
There is a case that has been winding its way through the courts. It is Missouri, Louisiana, etc. vs Biden, et al. It is a First Amendment case where the states have claimed that the Biden administration totally violated the first amendment, by forcing and coercing social media and other organizations to ban speech, block opinion and censor information they determined was against their interests. In other words, the government was using private companies and enterprises to do what they are categorically prohibited from doing.