PDJT launched his 2020 re-election campaign in Orlando on Tuesday in front of the largest crowd ever at a Presidential campaign stop. The energy in Orlando was incredible. PDJT was really stoked.
With what is probably the largest crowd in history on hand at any Presidential campaign stop ever, President Trump kicked off his re-election campaign in Orlando on Tuesday. More than 100,000 people showed up. Most of them knew they would not be able to get into the Amway Center. They showed up anyway. Why? Because PDJT shows up for us and doesn’t back down.
The common people of this country have awakened to the absolute corruption that infests Washington. They are saying that enough is enough.
This week Chairman Nadler of the House Judiciary Committee opened impeachment hearings into PDJT’s conduct as President. The fact that the entire Russia conspiracy investigation was without predication does not seem to bother the Chairman. In order to “educate” the public and to cover up the malfeasance of the Obama administration, Nadler brought in convicted felon John Dean to give the public some historical context from the Watergate years.
The outcome of the Mueller investigation was that PDJT and his campaign were cleared of any criminal wrongdoing. This covered the campaign and PDJT’s subsequent actions as President. Of course, this infuriated the Democrats who will stoop to anything to oust Trump from the Presidency.
The Democrats have been trying to re-litigate the whole investigation. In order to smear the President, they called in John Dean as the ghost of Watergate past to cast aspirations on PDJT. Dean, who was White House counsel for President Nixon during the Watergate era, drew “parallels” between the scandal that led to President Nixon’s resignation and special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of the hoax that was the Russian government ties to the campaign of President Donald Trump.
A good question. Just why do the Democrats oppose saving American lives? It couldn’t have anything to do with adding illegal aliens to the voter rolls, could it?
On Monday, under the auspices of Chairman Nadler, the House Judiciary Committee began impeachment proceedings against PDJT. The committee session is called Lessons from the Mueller Report: Presidential Obstruction and Other Crimes.
Former Secretary of State and twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton acted in support of the Democratic playbook on impeachment Monday. HRC posted on Twitter that the President is not above the law. The current Democratic strategy is to advance the storyline that PDJT acts as if he is above the law. This is supposed to plant in the public’s mind the false narrative that PDJT is routinely violating the law. No facts are ever given to support this fantasy.
A week or so ago, Julie Pace, an anti-Trumper who pretends to be an impartial journalist, went on CNN, the network that is shedding employees like there is no tomorrow. And that may be the case for CNN. Pace reported that Pelosi knows that she cannot win an impeachment proceeding. The Senate will not convict on whatever made-up charges that the Democrats concoct. Pelosi and her entrenched Democratic brethren are not interested in pursuing legitimate legal inquiries into PDJT. They are a lot more interested in doing opposition research for the 2020 election and “impeachment” proceedings may be the vehicle for doing that.
On Friday U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr had a 48-minute interview with Jan Crawford on CBS. The interview covered a variety of issues. There is much insight here into the ongoing “review” of prior DOJ and FBI conduct during the 2016 election. It included the “review” that AG Barr is conducting into the basis for the spying that was done on the Trump Campaign.
The entire interview can be heard here.
The section below concerns a bit of Barr’s background and also what the AG’s responsibilities to the people are. It also touches on what Barr’s basic concerns are regarding the “review.” One of the things that jumps out is that Barr believes that the AG’s office is responsible to protect the people’s rights. When was the last time we had an AG who believed that his office was there to protect the people’s rights from government abuse?
In Part 1 a lot of different items were covered with regard to the biggest political scandal in the history of our country. There were intentional deceptions that may have put national security at risk. There were undercover operations that were designed to “dirty up” Trump campaign advisors. There were entrapment schemes to silence/control people who may have known something about what was going on. There was the Steele Dossier. There were FISA warrants issued based on unverified information. There is the Mueller report which intentionally misleads the public regarding the extent of Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 election as well as who the Russians would have preferred to see as President. And as time goes on and more malfeasance is exposed, we will see even more corruption from inside the Obama administration.
However, none of this exposes the origins of the corruption inside the Obama administration. In fact, much of this serves as a smokescreen to divert the public’s attention. So, just where and when was the germination point for the beginnings of the corrupt activities?
To get into the big picture about the origins of Spygate, there is a lot that one needs to ignore. Allowing oneself to get caught up in emotion, whether it be righteous anger or unbridled outrage, will lead to being distracted from the real origins of the attacks against this country and this administration.
Not that there is nothing here to be outraged or upset over. There is much here that makes the blood boil. It is difficult to know where to start.