In an absolutely bizarre twist in the Flynn case, the retired judge who was appointed to file an amicus brief with the court is now requesting a briefing schedule, oral arguments and the possibility of interviewing witnesses.
Last week the DOJ filed a motion in the Michael Flynn case to dismiss the charges against Flynn “with prejudice.” This would mean that the long nightmare would be over for LTG Flynn. Certainly part of the reason the dismissal request was made was the Brady material that a US Attorney from Missouri found that had never been given to the Flynn defense. This material was exculpatory and also demonstrated that Flynn had been framed by the FBI. Other declassified material also demonstrated egregious prosecutorial misconduct.
AG Barr recognized that such material would continue to be presented to the court by Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell. Barr also recognized that there had been a witch hunt to get Flynn. Rather than air all this dirty laundry out in a public courtroom, Barr decided to right an injustice and filed to dismiss the charges.
Last week acting DNI Ric Grenell forced the release by Adam Schiff of the transcripts that Schiff had been refusing to release. These were transcripts of testimonies given by dozens of witnesses. These showed that many Democratic TV personalities have lied over and over when on TV broadcasts about elements of the Russian Collusion hoax.
What garnered far less attention at the time was the fact that DNI Grenell delivered a second set of documents to AG Barr on the same day. At the time no one seemed to know just what was in those documents.
The Democrats are clearly in panic mode right now. On Sunday morning, former Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks joined “the Big Lie” movement when she stated unequivocally that the move by the DOJ to drop the Flynn case was “a clear cover-up.” This occurred on MSNBC’s AM Joy program. According to Wine-Banks, because Flynn was facing jail time, Flynn might have had more to offer about Russian involvement in the Trump Administration. Therefore, Barr had to intervene in order to prevent Flynn from doing so.
What alternate reality is this woman living in? None of the other three panelists nor the moderator disagreed. Many were nodding their heads. This is what stage 4 Trump Derangement Syndrome looks like.
The following is a phone call from former President Obama. Who is on the other end is unclear. However, without a doubt, the listeners on this call are members of the Obama Alumni Association. The call was “leaked” to Michael Isikoff. Be forewarned. This is not the smooth and silken presentation that we are accustomed to hearing from Obama.
There are some people who are not completely brainwashed about what happened to Michael Flynn. However, they want to believe that the Flynn case was unique. They reluctantly admit that there seems to have been some corrupt activity going on in connection with this case. However, they attribute this to personal animosity toward Flynn. Such animosity overcame professional judgment. They may even partially blame Flynn because he was opposed to President Obama’s foreign policies. They admit it should never have happened but this was an unusual situation and does not reflect the normal course of business for these people.
Now I understand the desire to believe that this kind of corruption does not exist in our government as a normal course of business. However, this was no one-time affair. The following interview with Kathleen “K. T.” McFarland on Thursday should disabuse these people of this belief.
On Thursday the DOJ filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice the charge against LTG Michael Flynn. General Flynn, a patriot, who served his country with honor and distinction for more than three decades, was railroaded by the holdovers in the FBI and DOJ from the Obama-Biden administration.
A recap:
At some point during 2016 (no later than August 2016) the Washington Field Office (WFO) of the FBI initiated an investigation into General Flynn. This was done under FARA, that is, the Foreign Agent Registration Act. This was a bogus investigation undertaken to discredit a patriot. The initiation most certainly came from FBI headquarters (FBIHQ) and not the WFO. WFO was tasked with the actual grunt work.
As anyone who has followed the Michael Flynn case will attest, the progress of the Flynn case from his plea to his sentencing has been slow. There are glaciers in Alaska in winter that have been moving faster than this case. However, now it’s like a spring thaw on a frozen river.
As is becoming more and more apparent with each passing day, elite figures within the Obama-Biden administration conspired to frame LTG Flynn. As a seasoned intelligence officer who would be head of the NSC, Flynn was a threat to uncovering the plot to overthrow the administration of PDJT. That threat had to be eliminated.
I am speculating here. It seems to me that AG Bill Barr probably detected problems with the Flynn case some time ago. Barr may have discerned that the prosecution was bogus. After all, Barr has said that spying on the Trump campaign was “without basis.” Barr was lambasted by the media for doing so “without offering evidence.” Since when is the media entitled to see the evidence in a criminal case?
I must confess that I have always liked House Representative Jim Jordan. He has always struck me as a no-nonsense guy who is a straight shooter. On Monday, in his role as ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Jordan sent a letter to FBI Director Wray. In it Jordan is questioning why the exposing of an unbelievable level of political corruption has to come from a case in a courtroom rather than from Director Wray himself.
View the full six page letter.
The exposing of criminality within the elite levels of the FBI continues. In effect Jordan has tossed an IED into Director Wray’s lap. In addition to requesting all documents and communications relating to the investigation as well as communications among the executive branch agencies (good luck with that…Obama will assert executive privilege). Jordan has asked for the following:
For more than a month the Tara Reade accusations against Joe Biden have been out. Up to last Thursday the MSM had spent almost no time at all covering the story. Not a single reporter had asked a question of Joe Biden about the accusations during that period of time.
This is the exact opposite of what would have happened if a Republican had been accused. The media would have been consumed with trying to force the resignation of such an individual without ever trying to find out if there was any substance to the story. Witness the Brett Kavanaugh witch hunt.