Why Do Democrats Oppose Saving American Lives?

A good question. Just why do the Democrats oppose saving American lives? It couldn’t have anything to do with adding illegal aliens to the voter rolls, could it?

A good question. Just why do the Democrats oppose saving American lives? It couldn’t have anything to do with adding illegal aliens to the voter rolls, could it?
Today is the 75th anniversary of the beginning of the end for Hitler’s Germany.
On this day in 1944, Supreme Allied Commander General Dwight D. Eisenhower gave the go-ahead for the largest amphibious military operation in history: Operation Overlord, code named D-Day, the Allied invasion of northern France. The operation had been delayed one day by bad weather.
To get into the big picture about the origins of Spygate, there is a lot that one needs to ignore. Allowing oneself to get caught up in emotion, whether it be righteous anger or unbridled outrage, will lead to being distracted from the real origins of the attacks against this country and this administration.
Not that there is nothing here to be outraged or upset over. There is much here that makes the blood boil. It is difficult to know where to start.
Now that declassification has been announced, what can be expected from the Democrats? Keep in mind that the potential legal exposure of members of the Obama administration is considerable. Already there is a scramble to deflect blame by some of the chief participants in the Russia narrative hoax.
For Memorial Day weekend, let us remember those who protected our right to be free.
Recently a young woman was arrested on the campus of UNC Chapel Hill for allegedly punching a pro-life advocate. Now there has been a second arrest after another young woman stole a pro-life sign.
And the woman was incredulous that she would be arrested for stealing a pro-life sign. She does not seem to comprehend that you can’t just take someone else’s property simply because you don’t like their worldview.
Democrats and those on the extreme left (I realize I am being redundant here) have been moving more and more towards expanding laws that allow the killing of children. Earlier this year the leftist-dominated NY State legislature passed a law to cheers and applause that allowed a child to be killed up to the moment of birth.
The NY Governor celebrated that new law by lighting state sites pink. Black or blood red would have been a more appropriate color.
In what historians will undoubtedly debate as a master stroke, PDJT announced on Friday that the tariffs on aluminum and steel from Canada and Mexico had been removed. At the same time Canada and Mexico removed their tariffs on American goods. All of this is expected to be in effect by Monday, May 20th.
Bloomberg…President Donald Trump said the U.S. will lift steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico, boosting efforts to encourage lawmakers to ratify a new North American trade deal (USMCA).
Are the Democrats trying to convince the public that spying on a presidential campaign is routine? Are they doing this because they know that damning information is going to be released in the near future about the spying that the Obama administration did on opposition candidates? That such spying may go all the way back to 2012?
Are the Democrats so deranged that they are trying to make it seem like it is normal to do this, that it is no big deal? And that the public should just go about their business because there is nothing to be seen here?
Are the Democrats guilty of obstruction of justice? It is clear now that the administrative state needs to remove AG Bill Barr from his office quickly. Failing in this will result in serious legal exposure for many top intelligence officials from the Obama administration. Are the Democrats, who are allies of these officials, obstructing the investigation by trying to oust AG Barr? By trying to smear AG Barr? By trying to get AG Barr to violate the law by releasing a public copy of the unredacted Mueller Report?