Category Archives: Congress

The Storm Is Here

      Comments Off on The Storm Is Here

Devin Nunes is the Ranking Member, former Chairman, of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.  Please listen to this interview and keep in mind that EVERYTHING in the Nunes memo from 2018 has been proven to be true by IG Horowitz’ report.  This is despite a virulent campaign launched by the Democrats and their allies in the media against Nunes and his family almost two years ago.

Sundance at CTH notes,

Continue reading...

Money Laundering

      Comments Off on Money Laundering

A lot of evidence is emerging about corruption in the Ukraine.  Many people on both sides of the aisle give at least lip service to the idea that Ukraine was quite corrupt as a country.  Despite this the elite pols in Washington are in a frenzy about PDJT asking the new President of Ukraine to look into possible corruption.  The new Ukrainian President, who is not a politician, ran on an anti-corruption platform.

One has to ask why the frenzy?  Why would they be upset about investigating corruption in Ukraine?  What would sunlight on corrupt activities in Ukraine reveal?  Who would be exposed?  Why is Joe Biden once again trumpeting the lie that there was “no hint of scandal” during the Obama administration?

Continue reading...

The Circus Comes To Town

      Comments Off on The Circus Comes To Town

Sometime this week ringmaster Adam Schiff will entertain the country with the beginnings of the public phase of his star-chamber proceeding.  Adam Schiff, as he has proven over and over again, is no seeker after the truth.  For two years during the Mueller investigation he regaled the American public with lies about what he had seen in classified documents.  These lies painted a picture of such corruption by PDJT that PDJT would likely be marched out of the White House in handcuffs when the Mueller Report was released.  Of course, when the report was released, Schiff was convicted in the court of public opinion as a Congressman with exactly zero credibility.

This upcoming public circus is the result of actions that the Democrats took recently in the House.  House Democrats passed a resolution that defined the procedures for their inquiry moving forward.  Keep in mind the inquiry has never been officially authorized by a full House vote.  The procedures do not permit any witnesses to be called unless they are approved by Josef Stalin wannabe Adam Schiff. So the idea of something fair and transparent is about as likely as hell freezing over.

Continue reading...

A Lynching

      Comments Off on A Lynching

Clarence Thomas called it “a high tech lynching” when the Democrats accused  Thomas of being a sex maniac during his confirmation hearings.  The Democrats were trying to create a “lynching” atmosphere so that they could defeat his nomination.  The facts be damned.  A good man was smeared because the Democrats did not like the fact that he was a constitutionalist.  The Dems knew that it would be difficult to persuade Thomas to abandon his legal principles and vote to transform the country into something other than a constitutional republic.  Therefore his nomination had to be derailed.  The Dems did not succeed because a good man stood up and called them out on what they were trying to do.

They tried the same thing with Justice Kavanaugh.  Instead of Anita Hill, they substituted Christine Blasey Ford. Her story was as fake as it gets. The storyline was deliberately obtuse so that few details could be checked.  Why?  If real details were there, the whole narrative would have quickly collapsed like the house of cards that it was.  It did eventually collapse anyway but not before the Dems had once again smeared a good man.

There is no question but that the Dems are trying this again.  This time it is the President that they are trying to lynch.  Nineteen minutes after PDJT took the oath of office, the Washington Post was front and center reporting that the impeachment case against PDJTwas underway.

Continue reading...

An Indictment

      Comments Off on An Indictment

An interesting bit of news hit the wire on Wednesday.   Via DOJ, one Imaad Zuberi, a 49-year-old resident of Arcadia, California, agreed to plead guilty to a variety of illegal activities surrounding campaign contributions, political influence, and unregistered lobbying on behalf of foreign clients.

Zuberi has agreed to plead guilty to those charges at a later date, pursuant to a plea agreement.  This kind of language in a charging situation normally indicates that the felon has agreed to help out with other cases.  His sentencing recommendation will depend on how truthful and helpful he is to prosecutors at the DOJ.

Just who was he raising money for? And how much?

Continue reading...

Ambassador Sondland Does Not Appear

      Comments Off on Ambassador Sondland Does Not Appear

U.S. Ambassador Gordon Sondland was directed by the State Department not to appear Tuesday for an interview with House committees leading the fraudulent impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. The non-appearance follows Chairman Adam Schiff’s manipulative media releases based on Ambassador Kurt Volker testimony.

This video exposes both the corrupt attempts by the Democrats to undo the results of the 2016 election as well as these House members calling out members of the press for their lack of due diligence.  It is worth 13 minutes of your time.

Continue reading...

Star Chamber Proceeding

      Comments Off on Star Chamber Proceeding

On Monday, Rep. Adam Schiff, the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and Rep. Eliot L. Engel, the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, sent a letter to Department of Defense (DOD) Secretary Mark Esper and a letter to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acting Director Russell Vought conveying “subpoenas” for key documents as part of the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.

Continue reading...

Is The ICIG Guilty of A Corrupt Act?

      Comments Off on Is The ICIG Guilty of A Corrupt Act?

It was widely known that in order to submit an ICIG whistleblower report that the information had to be firsthand knowledge.  No hearsay or gossip was permitted.  It was stated unequivocally that submitting second-hand knowledge would result in the complaint being rejected.

As Sean Davis at The Federalist noted,

“The [Intelligence Community Inspector General] cannot transmit information via the ICPWA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing,” the previous form stated under the bolded heading “FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED.” “This includes information received from another person, such as when an employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing.”

“If you think that wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, [the Intelligence Community Inspector General] will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA,” the form concluded.

Continue reading...